[s]
& [ʃ]
are in complementary distribution within Japanese as I already know, but I don't speak Japanese and I'm finding it difficult to give examples how they are in distribution, are there any examples which could work?
1 Answer
As has been noted in the comments, [s] and [ɕ] (sometimes broadly transcribed as [ʃ]) are not in complementary distribution in Japanese. However, they can be analyzed as allophones of the same phoneme.
The following rule can be used to explain some of the facts:
/s/ --> [ɕ] before [i], [s] elsewhere
[asa] 'morning'
[ɕi] 'four'
[aɕi] 'foot'
[isu] 'chair'
[seki] 'cough'
[heso] 'belly button'
However, [ɕ] also appears before other vowels besides [i]:
[iɕa] 'doctor'
[hoɴɕuː] 'Honshu'
[ɕoːyu] 'soy sauce'
This leads to an analysis in which it is sensible to treat /ɕ/ as its own phoneme.
Not counting the less nativized loanword pronunciations of words (like [siː] for the English letter 'C'), we never get [s] before [i]. Related forms like [osu] 'press-PRESENT' and [oɕita] 'press-PAST' give us further evidence that at least some instances of [ɕ] before [i] are likely surface realizations of /s/.
So, one analysis that captures all of the facts is that there are two phonemes--/s/, which has the allophones [s] and [ɕ], and /ɕ/, which always surfaces as [ɕ].
EDIT: In response to comments below, here is an alternative analysis that can also capture the facts:
We observe that palatalized versions of consonants may appear before [a], [o], and [u]:
[kʲoku] 'piece of music'
[nʲuːiɴ] 'hospitalization'
[ɾʲoːhoː] 'both'
[hʲaku] 'one hundred'
[happʲaku] 'eight hundred'
[sambʲaku] 'three hundred'
[bimʲoː] 'subtle'
(The choice of transcription of these Cʲ onsets varies; some choose to use [ç] instead of [hʲ], for example.)
There are some gaps--the alveolar stops ([t], [d]), alveolar fricatives ([s], and [z]), and the bilabial approximant [w] do not have palatalized counterparts. The [w] gap is not an unexpected one, since [w] is the only approximant (besides [j] itself). Historically, the palatalized counterparts of [t], [d], [s], and [z] became what are now the alveolo-palatal consonants [tɕ], [dʑ], [ɕ], and [ʑ], respectively. Further, these alveolo-palatal consonants do not have palatalized counterparts (there is no [ɕ]/[ɕʲ] contrast, for example).
Due to the above facts, some consider it reasonable to adopt a synchronic analysis in which all surface occurrences of [tɕ] and [dʑ] are underlyingly /tʲ/ and /dʲ/, respectively, and all surface occurrences of [ɕ] and [ʑ] are underlyingly /sʲ/ and /tʲ/ (or even /sj/ and /tj/), respectively.
-
As far as I know, [ɕ] other than before [i] is restricted to loanwords (including ongaku readings of Chinese morphemes, some of which have been in Japanese for a very long time). Certainly all three examples above are ongaku. Nov 14, 2013 at 19:19
-
[muʃi] [ase] [miso] [toʃi] [muʃi] - I've been given these examples and thus far the only thing I can think to explain is that [ʃ] occurs before closed front & central vowels. It might be that I have been explicitly told that they are in complementary distribution, but this isn't clicking in my head.– DominicNov 14, 2013 at 20:16
-
1@ColinFine that would make sense, but some would shrug that off as a historical accident that is irrelevant for synchronic analyses. Nov 14, 2013 at 21:14
-
1@Sjiveru actually, the occurrence of [ɕ] before non-[i] vowels does derive historically from /s/+/j/. One could adopt such an analysis to explain the data synchronically, but it is unclear how one would justify the existence of an underlying /j/ that never surfaces. Nov 14, 2013 at 21:19
-
1Further supporting this is that if you treat [ɕ] as [ɕj], then there are no exceptions at all to "/s/ becomes [ɕ] before palatals." Japanese natives also have terrible trouble pronouncing [sj] and [si] without palatalizing the [s].– ithisaNov 16, 2013 at 3:09
[s]
and[ʃ]
the same way. Specifically,[s] -> [ʃ] / __[i]
. Compare the Japanese for "three",[san]
, with the Japanese for "four",[ʃi]
. I believe[si]
and[ʃan]
are both unattested in Japanese (this is the case for Korean). Additionally, in Korean the same change is triggered by the approximate[j]
. I'd suggest having a Japanese speaker confirm if this is the case in Japanese too.