Take the 2-minute tour ×
Linguistics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional linguists and others with an interest in linguistic research and theory. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Both Japanese and Korean are "topic-comment" languages and both have an explicit topic particle.

(I believe Chinese might be an example of a topic-comment language without a topic particle but I may be wrong.)

Which other languages have topic particles? Any well-known languages?

share|improve this question
    
I just discovered Mongolian has a subject marker, "нь" (n'). –  hippietrail Dec 9 '13 at 5:50
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

They're not particularly well-known, but some modern Mayan languages have topic particles. (Others have a more Chinese-like system, with the topic appearing at the front of the sentence but without a special particle to mark it.)

A Google Scholar search for the phrase "topic particle" turns up a good number of hits on other languages. Malagasy gets a bunch of mentions; it's still not exactly well known, but it's a national language with (according to Wikipedia) around 20 million speakers.

share|improve this answer
    
Topic-marking is common in Austronesian languages, but not necessarily via topic particles. –  Gaston Ümlaut Oct 31 '11 at 22:42
    
Well I've at least met Mayan speakers and one Malagasy speaker. But which Mayan languages? The most accessible for me is Tzutujil of Guatemala since I have books on it in storage and have visited the area a few times. –  hippietrail Nov 1 '11 at 5:34
1  
Yes Tzutujil actually has two topic particles! k'aa(r) and k'ii(r). Interestingly it also has a definite article ja. As for Malagasy, its topic particle is dia. –  hippietrail Nov 1 '11 at 10:30
add comment

Aymara and Quechua have both topic and focus markers. There's a paper on the pragmatic suffixes in Aymara with a detailed explanation and many examples:

Homola, Petr, and Matt Coler. 2013. “Pragmatic Structures in Aymara.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics, edited by Eva Hajičová, Kim Gerdes, and Leo Wanner, 98–107. Prague: MATFYZPRESS.

share|improve this answer
1  
Interesting! (+1) Here, too, some examples and details on authors, issue and pages of the article would also be highly appreciated :) –  robert Sep 9 '13 at 21:21
add comment

In one paper, Hirano analyzes Tagalog "ay" as being a topic marker. It's traditionally treated as an inversion marker. If that is true, there are a few more Philippine languages (Sambalic languages, Aklanon, and some Cordilleran languages) with such topic markers.

Bashiic, a group of Austronesian languages in Northern Philippines, are analyzed as having topic particle. In Itbayaten, this is "o". In Yami, its either "o" or "am".

share|improve this answer
    
Now I need to read up on "inversion markers" - thanks (-: –  hippietrail Dec 20 '12 at 4:53
add comment

I just now discovered that Wikipedia has an article "Topic marker".

While that article currently makes no mention of Mayan or Austronesian languages, it devotes an entire section to Classical Chinese.

The suffix 者 zhe is similar to the Japanese は wa, but is used very sporadically in Classic Chinese and used only when an author wants to emphasize the topic; otherwise zhe is usually omitted. This is different from Japanese, in which the topic marker is generally required.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.