Revisions to Why do so many core Romanian words with Latin roots come from different roots than in the other Romance languages?

Notice added Needs citation by curiousdannii♦

occurred Nov 2, 2022 at 4:30

deleted 10 characters in body

Source Link

edited Dec 9, 2012 at 23:35

9.5k
5
49
81

I would like to bring in a different point of view which was wrongly marginalized because it does not suit political agendas.

ROMANIAN DOES NOT STEM FROM LATINRomanian does not stem from Latin, this is why it is different compared to some of the Romance languages, it stems from Dacian. According to this view and ancient documents, the Dacian language (the language of the people that inhabited Romanian territory and the Balkans during Roman times) and the Latin language were related languages already, there are a lot of very strong scientific/historic arguments to support this idea.

An example: around 3000BC Aryans arrived in India and left there the Vedic Bible which is a monument to the Proto-European language that originated in the territory of Dacia. Well, in Vedic Sanskrit [water] is not [aqua] but is APA exactly like in Romanian APA that came directly from the Dacian language, and Sanskrit APA gave words that are similar to Romanian words that have no analog in Latin, ex. Vedic: APAYA, Rom.: APARAIA - a lot of water, flood.

Thank you.

I would like to bring in a different point of view which was wrongly marginalized because it does not suit political agendas.

ROMANIAN DOES NOT STEM FROM LATIN, this is why it is different compared to some of the Romance languages, it stems from Dacian. According to this view and ancient documents, the Dacian language (the language of the people that inhabited Romanian territory and the Balkans during Roman times) and the Latin language were related languages already, there are a lot of very strong scientific/historic arguments to support this idea.

An example: around 3000BC Aryans arrived in India and left there the Vedic Bible which is a monument to the Proto-European language that originated in the territory of Dacia. Well, in Vedic Sanskrit [water] is not [aqua] but is APA exactly like in Romanian APA that came directly from the Dacian language, and Sanskrit APA gave words that are similar to Romanian words that have no analog in Latin, ex. Vedic: APAYA, Rom.: APARAIA - a lot of water, flood.

Thank you.

I would like to bring in a different point of view which was wrongly marginalized because it does not suit political agendas.

Romanian does not stem from Latin, this is why it is different compared to some of the Romance languages, it stems from Dacian. According to this view and ancient documents, the Dacian language (the language of the people that inhabited Romanian territory and the Balkans during Roman times) and the Latin language were related languages already, there are a lot of very strong scientific/historic arguments to support this idea.

An example: around 3000BC Aryans arrived in India and left there the Vedic Bible which is a monument to the Proto-European language that originated in the territory of Dacia. Well, in Vedic Sanskrit [water] is not [aqua] but is APA exactly like in Romanian APA that came directly from the Dacian language, and Sanskrit APA gave words that are similar to Romanian words that have no analog in Latin, ex. Vedic: APAYA, Rom.: APARAIA - a lot of water, flood.

minor spelling, capitalization, and formatting

Source Link

edited Sep 4, 2012 at 8:22

hippietrail

14.8k
7
63
149

I would like to bring in a different point of view which was wrongly marginalized because it does not suit political agendas.

ROMANIAN DOES NOT STEM FROM LATIN, this is why it is different compared to some of the romanceRomance languages, it stems from Dacian. According to this view and ancient documents, dacianthe Dacian language (the language of the people that inhabited Romanian territory and the Balkans during romanRoman times) and the Latin language were related languages already, there are a lot of very strong scientific/historic arguments to support this idea. An

An example: arroundaround 3000BC ariansAryans arrived in indiaIndia and left there the Vedic Bible which is a monument to the proto europeanProto-European language that originated in the territory of Dacia. Well, in Vedic Sanskrit [water] is not [aqua] but is APA exactly like in romanianRomanian APA that came directly from the Dacian language, and sanskritSanskrit APA gave words that are similar to romanianRomanian words that havhave no anologanalog in latinLatin, ex. vedikVedic: APAYA, romRom.: APARAIA - a lot of water, flood.

Thank you.

I would like to bring in a different point of view which was wrongly marginalized because it does not suit political agendas. ROMANIAN DOES NOT STEM FROM LATIN, this is why it is different compared to some of the romance languages, it stems from Dacian. According to this view and ancient documents, dacian language (the language of the people that inhabited Romanian territory and Balkans during roman times) and Latin language were related languages already, there are a lot of very strong scientific/historic arguments to support this idea. An example: arround 3000BC arians arrived in india and left there the Vedic Bible which is a monument to the proto european language that originated in the territory of Dacia. Well, in Vedic Sanskrit [water] is not [aqua] but is APA exactly like in romanian APA that came directly from Dacian language, and sanskrit APA gave words that are similar to romanian words that hav no anolog in latin, ex. vedik: APAYA, rom.: APARAIA - a lot of water, flood.

Thank you.

I would like to bring in a different point of view which was wrongly marginalized because it does not suit political agendas.

ROMANIAN DOES NOT STEM FROM LATIN, this is why it is different compared to some of the Romance languages, it stems from Dacian. According to this view and ancient documents, the Dacian language (the language of the people that inhabited Romanian territory and the Balkans during Roman times) and the Latin language were related languages already, there are a lot of very strong scientific/historic arguments to support this idea.

An example: around 3000BC Aryans arrived in India and left there the Vedic Bible which is a monument to the Proto-European language that originated in the territory of Dacia. Well, in Vedic Sanskrit [water] is not [aqua] but is APA exactly like in Romanian APA that came directly from the Dacian language, and Sanskrit APA gave words that are similar to Romanian words that have no analog in Latin, ex. Vedic: APAYA, Rom.: APARAIA - a lot of water, flood.

Thank you.

Source Link

created Sep 3, 2012 at 22:06

haios

1

I would like to bring in a different point of view which was wrongly marginalized because it does not suit political agendas. ROMANIAN DOES NOT STEM FROM LATIN, this is why it is different compared to some of the romance languages, it stems from Dacian. According to this view and ancient documents, dacian language (the language of the people that inhabited Romanian territory and Balkans during roman times) and Latin language were related languages already, there are a lot of very strong scientific/historic arguments to support this idea. An example: arround 3000BC arians arrived in india and left there the Vedic Bible which is a monument to the proto european language that originated in the territory of Dacia. Well, in Vedic Sanskrit [water] is not [aqua] but is APA exactly like in romanian APA that came directly from Dacian language, and sanskrit APA gave words that are similar to romanian words that hav no anolog in latin, ex. vedik: APAYA, rom.: APARAIA - a lot of water, flood.

Thank you.

Stack Exchange Network

Return to Answer