Timeline for Is there a linguistics equivalent to Turing completeness?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2017 at 21:13 | comment | added | amI | Two whistled tones -- that's the FSK my old MODEM used. Don't confuse the medium with the message. | |
| Nov 7, 2017 at 11:13 | comment | added | Olical | Holistic and reductionist viewpoints? :) I'm reading Gödel, Escher, Bach at the moment, this question caught my eye since a lot of the book refers to similar concepts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach People viewing this question and subsequent answers may find it deeply interesting, as I have. | |
| Nov 7, 2017 at 5:58 | comment | added | TheEnvironmentalist | Interesting how we took opposite approaches. I looked as far outward as I could, trying to find complex, obscure situations that a language may not be capable of handling. You looked as far inward as you could, asking a language to describe itself. | |
| Nov 7, 2017 at 3:01 | comment | added | Aaron | ... and then the philosopher said, "is not a physicist simply a collection of atoms attempting to understand other atoms?" | |
| Nov 7, 2017 at 0:19 | history | edited | mat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
use Prolog as a better example
|
| Nov 7, 2017 at 0:02 | history | edited | mat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
e
|
| Nov 6, 2017 at 23:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 7, 2017 at 10:43 | |||||
| Nov 6, 2017 at 23:55 | history | answered | mat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |