Timeline for How do SOV languages develop agreement affixes on verb?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 at 22:01 | history | bounty ended | Otavio Macedo | ||
| Oct 22, 2012 at 15:11 | history | edited | lapropriu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added clarification
|
| Oct 22, 2012 at 14:49 | comment | added | lapropriu | Yes, I suppose modern Romance languages are not the best example given that we were talking about SOV languages. I can't say anything smart about Latin, but I'm now motivated to open a book on typology. | |
| Oct 21, 2012 at 20:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 22, 2012 at 19:12 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2012 at 17:25 | comment | added | Justin Olbrantz | Note that in Romance languages the direct object and indirect object verbal clitics are fossils of Latin syntax. Latin was most often SOV, and the clitics are exactly where you'd put the personal/demonstrative pronouns in Latin. | |
| Oct 21, 2012 at 15:56 | history | answered | lapropriu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |