Timeline for Adverbial free relative clauses, in early Indo-European languages and generally
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2013 at 3:43 | comment | added | TKR | Let's get this straight. There are two 'cum's in Latin. The one used in circumstantial clauses is a conjunction; the one used in prepositional phrases like magna cum laude is a preposition. (I know Cerberus and Colin Fine both know this, just clearing up the confusion in this comment thread.) | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 2:58 | comment | added | Cerberus | @ColinFine: In the construction TKR and Emsoap are talking about, it is a preposition... | |
| Oct 31, 2013 at 0:22 | comment | added | Colin Fine | To clarify TKR's comment: this cum is not the preposition cum that means with, but a homonymous word with a different meaning and origin. | |
| Oct 30, 2013 at 23:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 4, 2013 at 17:05 | |||||
| Oct 30, 2013 at 22:49 | comment | added | TKR | The Latin cum construction is completely different from the ones I'm asking about, in both sense and structure. (Btw, this cum is neither a relative pronoun nor a preposition, but a subordinating conjunction.) | |
| Oct 30, 2013 at 22:46 | history | answered | emsoap | CC BY-SA 3.0 |