Timeline for A predicate as argument of a predicate
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10 at 11:33 | comment | added | Atamiri | @SK_ The principles are well explained here: isi.edu/people-hobbs/research-areas/… | |
| Jul 10 at 10:18 | comment | added | SK_ | @Atamiri Could you cite about that? | |
| Jul 10 at 8:43 | comment | added | Atamiri | In Jerry Hobbs’ framework (based on FOL) there’s reification of pretty much everything, including embedded and complex predicates. It neatly reflects all the dependencies in an utterance. There are also computational models for it. | |
| Jul 5 at 11:24 | comment | added | SK_ | PS. Is there a way to continue this discussion in chat? I think that there are many things to be added. If someone could help, it would be great. | |
| Jul 5 at 11:16 | comment | added | SK_ | @NatalieClarius This is exactly the root of my questioning; either a new Logic is rising or this fragment has false meaning (or no meaning at all). | |
| Jul 5 at 11:06 | comment | added | Natalie Clarius | "an argument of a predicate P_1 can be another predicate P_2 with its own arguments" - Not in formal predicate calculus. In first-order calculus not anyway, but even with predicates of higher order, the argument would have to be a predicate P_1(P_2), and not an application of a predicate to arguments P_1(P_2(x)). | |
| Jul 4 at 21:44 | history | edited | SK_ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 610 characters in body
|
| Jul 3 at 20:07 | comment | added | Natalie Clarius | ... and not how predicate logic itself works, so it is not a question about logic. | |
| Jul 3 at 19:39 | comment | added | Natalie Clarius | @Lambie That's like saying "Probability is not medicine, it's from statistics" when someone asks what model best accounts for the risk factors of a certain disease. The question is about how to describe a certain linguistic phenomenon employing a mathematical tool. | |
| Jul 3 at 16:20 | comment | added | SK_ | @Lambie I am really trying to understand what do you mean by this comment. | |
| Jul 1 at 14:12 | answer | added | Natalie Clarius | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 1 at 9:05 | history | edited | SK_ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jun 30 at 20:01 | history | edited | SK_ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| S Jun 30 at 19:42 | review | First questions | |||
| Jul 3 at 6:05 | |||||
| S Jun 30 at 19:42 | history | asked | SK_ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |