Timeline for Long occlusive combined with syllable break
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 24 at 12:39 | history | suggested | Segorian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Spelling, punctuation,
|
| Oct 24 at 11:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 24 at 12:39 | |||||
| Oct 23 at 17:31 | comment | added | Lambie | I remember arguing with someone about this for Italian. In English, there is one sound but in Italian two sounds for a word like frittata. That's what makes Italian so charming. | |
| Oct 23 at 15:09 | answer | added | brass tacks | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 23 at 13:42 | comment | added | Janus Bahs Jacquet | The reason we tend to use /t.t/ as phonetically equivalent to /tː/ is that usually they are equivalent. It is almost universally the case that when two identical occlusive phonemes directly follow each other, there will be only one physical occlusion and one release for the group, unless they’re deliberately pronounced very distinctly and separately (e.g., ‘but to go’ is normally [bət̚.tʰə ˈɡəʊ], while ‘but: to go’ might be [ˈbətʰ | tʰə ˈɡəʊ]). | |
| Oct 23 at 12:21 | vote | accept | Agente 156 | ||
| Oct 23 at 10:45 | answer | added | Someone211 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 23 at 9:44 | history | edited | Agente 156 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 203 characters in body
|
| S Oct 23 at 9:38 | review | First questions | |||
| Oct 23 at 12:30 | |||||
| S Oct 23 at 9:38 | history | asked | Agente 156 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |