Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 2, 2015 at 0:22 vote accept mac389
Jan 5, 2014 at 20:17 comment added mac389 Why couldn't you say "Here, dog is sleeping."? It sounds quaint, but not far off from "Here there be dragons."
Jan 4, 2014 at 22:23 comment added P Elliott I wouldn't analyse here as a determiner, no, i'd have it as an adverb. It doesn't have the distribution of a determiner, e.g. you can't say here dog is sleeping. As for my second claim, i could find a direct quotation, but the point is very simple: If you have an XP node, it must dominate both an X' AND an X node. In other words, every phrase must have a head.
Jan 4, 2014 at 21:22 comment added Muffin Would you have DP-D'-D-here?
Jan 4, 2014 at 21:15 comment added Muffin What kind of node would u have then for 'here'?
Jan 4, 2014 at 21:09 comment added Muffin "I am trying to construct a first-order logic representation of the following sentence", then rewrite rules for a phrase structure tree follow. To me the question seemed to be "I am stuck on how to parse the word "here"" - from a syntactic perspective. Could you give me a quotation for your second claim? You are certainly right about the first one, I had changed the tree on the go without noticing: The D dominating AdvP shouldn't be there.
Jan 4, 2014 at 20:45 comment added P Elliott The questioner states clearly: "I am trying to construct a first-order logic representation of the following sentence", not a phrase structure tree. Additionally, there're a couple of things i find odd about this tree. You have a head D directly dominating a phrasal node AdvP which is counter to standard X'-theory. Also, AdvP isn't headed - again, counter to standard X'-theory.
Jan 4, 2014 at 20:45 review Late answers
Jan 5, 2014 at 11:13
Jan 4, 2014 at 20:36 history edited Muffin CC BY-SA 3.0
added 12 characters in body
Jan 4, 2014 at 20:29 history answered Muffin CC BY-SA 3.0