Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 21, 2020 at 4:01 comment added vectory You have absolutely no idea where German languages originated, don't be ridiculous.
Jan 21, 2020 at 3:57 comment added vectory The example of formulaic jokes leading with the verb is a) most often anaphoric, b) also frequent in legal scripture in a premisses-consequence opposition. Both legal and comedy rely on oral tradition so it's likely archaic, and thus a good example. Sadly its significance is not made clear. c) The verb does not necessarily lead but can follow a conjunction, or an adverb; cp ubiquitious use of and, and so in bible translation, which follows Hebrew, w- attached but to nouns; cp and then, and then, and then ... which comes natural to children but is proscribed as subpar style.
Jan 21, 2020 at 3:45 comment added vectory I remember reading on German.SE--I don't remember which thread--that weil had SVO order in some pockets of regional German for a long while that's easy to believe in face of the equivalent word order in English. Possibly ambiguous phrases in nominal style using gerunds and participles are imaginable
Jun 11, 2015 at 9:17 comment added dainichi I'm curious about the "weil" with V2. I think something similar is happening for "fordi" in Danish, although I'm not sure about the extent. I'm wondering if, rather than word order in motion, this is a symptom of "weil" taking over the function of "denn", including it's role as a coordinating conjunction. Or is there reason to argue that what comes after "weil" is still a subordinate clause in spite of the V2?
Jul 29, 2014 at 18:50 vote accept ABu
Jul 28, 2014 at 22:28 history edited user4938 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 435 characters in body
Jul 28, 2014 at 17:18 history edited user4938 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 5 characters in body
Jul 28, 2014 at 15:18 history answered user4938 CC BY-SA 3.0