Has there been any investigation into the ATR quality of the central alveolar approximant [ɹ]? It is very vowel-like and I have this theory that it could simply be the result of an advanced tongue root and a retracted tongue tip. Is that a crazy idea? I know there is probably more to it than that.
-
Are you asking about the /r/ phoneme in English? Or [ɹ] universally? There's a reason why it's called an "approximant".– jlawlerCommented Aug 16, 2013 at 23:35
-
All of the above.– MossCommented Aug 17, 2013 at 1:26
-
As far as English /r/ goes, there are quite a few different articulations in use that all pass as acceptable--ATR may well play a role in some. Have a look at this SE-Linguistics question and some of the links therein.– Gaston ÜmlautCommented Aug 17, 2013 at 7:55
-
Hmm. Yes, that link lead me to some other stuff and I see that there may indeed be multiple articulations for [ɹ]. If only the IPA told the whole story. Now that I try I seem to be able to produce two different styles of r. One that seems to be -ATR (or maybe its pharyngealization, can't tell the difference), the other +ATR. In their extremes the -ATR sounds like a sterotypical Southern States accent and the +ATR sounds like a strong Eastern Canadian. Does that make any sense? I guess [ɹ] is a much more mysterious sound than I was hoping for.– MossCommented Aug 17, 2013 at 19:00
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
If you are talking about [ATR] the phonological feature, then you will want to know whether there is [-ATR] approximant that alternates with [r] in some language. If you are talking about the physical parameter normally correlated with [ATR] in languages which have that feature, then it gets tricky since the exact articulatory/acoustic correlates to be associated with [ATR] are not fully agreed upon.
For the latter question, see, inter alia, Edmondson and Esling (2009) "The valves of the throat..."; Fulop, Kari and Ladefoged (1998) "An acoustic study of the tongue root contrast..."; and references therein.