I've created a phonemic alphabet. I realize that because it is phonemic, I do not need spaces or other markers to separate words; the spelling doesn't matter because each letter has one sound and doesn't change, even based on the letter around it. Thus I have two ways to write the same thing, and I was thinking I would use them differently.

I don't know a lot about linguistics. Based on the way other languages work, like Japanese, what are multiple systems used for in a language? For example, formal vs informal speech?


Phones I am aware of 33 different phones in the English language. Of these I use 30 because some of the sounds are redundant/uncommon (v and w are very similar so I use w, and the "xh" phone in "the" can be replaced with the "th" phone in "theory", and the "zh" phone in "casual" is rarely used).

With these 33 or 30 phones I have created an alphabet.

No Markers In English letters make different sounds based on the surrounding letters, like the word "change", where "c" followed by "h" makes the "ch" sound, the "g" makes the "j" sound, and the "e" is silent. Because my alphabet is phonemic (the letters don't change phones), I am able to string words together without markers that separate them; spelling no longer matters, just the sounds.

  • Can you take a screenshot? Curious how it looks...
    – Teusz
    Commented Jul 4, 2015 at 20:13
  • @Teusz I'm having issues with my phone, I'll get some pictures as soon as possible
    – Towell
    Commented Jul 4, 2015 at 23:53
  • 1
    "v and w are very similar so I use w". In English /v/ and /w/ are separate phonemes and can be found in minimal pairs like "vent" and "went".
    – fdb
    Commented Jul 5, 2015 at 11:12
  • @fdb I realize there will be some overlap, and if it becomes difficult to understand things I may add a letter. I'm using the alphabet as a way to encrypt my journals so no one can read them, so some errors are not too big an issue because I'm the only one reading it (probably)
    – Towell
    Commented Jul 5, 2015 at 15:28
  • 1
    If this 'phonetic' alphabet is designed to represent the sounds of English, then the correct term for it is phonemic system And btw, such a system is not hard to decrypt! Commented Jul 5, 2015 at 22:56

3 Answers 3


A recent post on LanguageLog discusses this very question in the particular case of Korean. For centuries, Korean has been written in a mixture of Chinese characters and Hangul. In most contexts today, only Hangul is used; but here is a case where it has been written entirely in Chinese characters, apparently because of the formality of the occasion.

  • Also, I believe Hanja (Chinese characters) is used in cases of ambiguity when a word/syllable might have a pure Korean meaning and also a Sino-Korean meaning. Commented Jul 6, 2015 at 0:23

Your alphabet is completely phonetic? Are you sure? The Sound Pattern of English feature system has around 17 orthogonal features which, even if they are all binary valued, gives 2^17 distinct sound segments. That takes a pretty big alphabet. (Though not all sounds occur in all languages.)

I don't know why you think that a phonetic alphabet doesn't need word spaces. Some writing systems have not marked word divisions, but I don't think it has to do with how phonetic the system is.

Trying to answer your question, my impression is that different writing systems for a single language have been maintained by different religious groups of a community.

  • Japanese is a good example; Chinese characters (kanji, usually with several pronunciations and/or meanings each), two syllabaries with different uses, romaji romanization, and Arabic numerals, plus punctuation. All mixed in arbitrarily, with never a thought given to making it simplier, but rather more complex and artful.
    – jlawler
    Commented Jul 4, 2015 at 21:42
  • @Greg Lee can you include some examples of what the various systems in a single language is used for (for example formal, informal)? I am not interested in who uses them, but what they are used for.
    – Towell
    Commented Jul 5, 2015 at 0:12
  • No, I can't. Maybe John can.
    – Greg Lee
    Commented Jul 5, 2015 at 1:33

There is already such an alphabet: the International Phonetic Alphabet. I assume that you mean that you've created an alternative to the IPA (perhaps one omitting nonexistent sounds, depending on what language this is supposed to be for).

Competing alphabets (and abjads / abugidas -- a technical distinction in kinds of non-pictographic writing systems) reflect social distinctions of some kind. The indigenous Vai syllabary is used I suppose you would say to be "traditional", but Latin-based letters are used to be "modern". The most frequent divide, as far as I know, is religion (e.g. Sindhi which is written in Devanagari, Gurmukhi and Arabic which roughly aligns with the Hindu / Sikh / Muslim division). There are also nationality-based distinctions such as Latin alphabet for Kurdish in Turkey vs. Arabic script in Iran and Iraq, or traditional Mongolian script in Inner Mongolia (China) vs. Cyrillic in Mongolia (or, Latin on the interwebs). Likewise, Canadian Aboriginal syllabics are used along with Latin script, depending on language and dialect, province (Nunavut vs. Labrador Inuktitut).

  • Thank you for the input, however this does not answer my question. I would like to know what multiple writing systems in a single language are used for
    – Towell
    Commented Jul 5, 2015 at 0:15
  • 1
    As I say, it is used for expressing social differences.
    – user6726
    Commented Jul 5, 2015 at 6:28
  • Also, Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian/Montenegrin: Cyrillic is used more in Serbia/by Serbians and Latin by Croats/in Croatia etc. Commented Jul 6, 2015 at 0:41
  • And the (now defunt) Arebica script used for Bosnian. Commented Jul 6, 2015 at 0:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.