2

wretch, n. and adj.
Etymology: Old English wrecca , wræcca , = Old Saxon wrekkio , -eo (applied to the Magi), Old High German reccheo , reccho , etc., exile, adventurer, knight errant (Middle High German and German recke warrior, hero)
< Old Germanic *wrakja(n)- ,
< the stem wrak- , wrek- : see wreak v. The contrast in the development of the meaning in English and German is remarkable.

[Etymonline:] Old English wrecca "wretch, stranger, exile,"
from Proto-Germanic * wrakjon "pursuer; one pursued" (cognates: Old Saxon wrekkio, Old High German reckeo "a banished person, exile," German recke "renowned warrior, hero") [...]

Would someone please explain OED`s last sentence? What's remarkable?

From the above, I see that * wrakjon induced two cognates with opposing meanings (in English, the pursued; in German, the pursuer). Is this difference what is remarkable?

Instead, should the remark arise from the Proto-Germanic *wrakjon? Was this a contronym?
How can the same word mean the subject and the object (ie: "pursuer; one pursued")?

  • The opposing cognates is the remarkable part. The -jan/-jon suffix is the PIE causative suffix, which later palatalized final consonants (wreak/wretch, but also milk/milch, drink/drench, break/breach, blank/blanch, bank/bench, hang/hinge, and many more pairs. As for how they got different, it's a matter of whose side you're on. If the knights are chasing you, you're a wretch; but if you're a knight chasing a fugitive, you're wreaking justice. – jlawler Aug 1 '15 at 22:48
  • When was that entry written? I ask because I suspect that 'remarkable' is used there in its (now somewhat archaic) sense of 'noteworthy', rather than the modern sense of 'extraordinary'. – Gaston Ümlaut Aug 3 '15 at 0:47
  • Recke certainly has to be compared to rect- et al, Wrack to verrecken. – vectory Feb 16 '19 at 23:34
2

I think that you are right about the reason for the term "remarkable": because the English term (wretch) is pejorative, whereas German Recke refers to a figure (a warrior or hero) that is likely to be praised.

Whether this contrast is objectively remarkable -- i.e. whether such a semantic development is improbable or statistically rare -- is a different question. But, I doubt that the person who made that statement (in the dictionary entry) was trying to be objectively precise.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.