13

Swedish has quite a peculiarity that I haven't found (yet) in other languages. There are some spellings that are pronounced all the same way. Currently the number of these spellings is disputed, but it seems that a minimum list was compiled. From this section in the Swedish Alphabet wikipedia article:

Garlén (1988) gives a list of 22 spellings (⟨ch⟩, ⟨che⟩, ⟨g⟩, ⟨ge⟩, ⟨gi⟩, ⟨ige⟩, ⟨j⟩, ⟨je⟩, ⟨sc⟩, ⟨sch⟩, ⟨sh⟩, ⟨shi⟩, ⟨si⟩, ⟨sj⟩, ⟨sk⟩, ⟨skj⟩, ⟨ssi⟩, ⟨ssj⟩, ⟨stg⟩, ⟨sti⟩, ⟨stj, ⟨ti⟩), but many of them are confined to only a few words, often loan words, and all of them can correspond to other sounds or sound sequences as well.

But like I said others say the list is much longer. Not only the number is under a dispute, however, since also the classification of the sound itself is "under fire".

From the Wikipedia article about the Sj-sound, represented with the IPA /ɧ/, has many classifications. From the same article:

The International Phonetic Association describes [ɧ] as "simultaneous [ʃ] and [x]", but this claim is disputed among phoneticians, including at least one former president of the IPA. Other descriptive labels include voiceless palatal-velar fricative, voiceless dorso-palatal velar fricative, voiceless postalveolar and velar fricative, or voiceless coarticulated velar and palatoalveolar fricative. The closest English phoneme is /ʃ/ ⟨sh⟩.

What is the current situation? In other words, was a consensus reached? I understand this is hard, but who knows. Also, what are the most important papers/resources about this topic?

  • so the Swedish "h", so to speak has 22 allophonic utterances? interesting! – nb1 Feb 6 '12 at 7:14
  • 1
    @NikhilBellarykar Some say even more... But I don't know all of Swedish spellings to give an opinion on that! I thought it only was sk, sj and another or 2 spellings, not that much. :) – Alenanno Feb 6 '12 at 9:15
  • This is the first time I hear about this dispute. However, I do understand that it can be kinda confusing. The "sound" can actually vary depending on the dialect a person speaks as well. The /ʃ/ can be for the average Swede a /ʃ/ but for a Swedish native speaker in Finland that can be a t͡s. Indeed the closest sound in English is [ʃ] like "shaft", but the [ɧ]-like sound in common dialects has no equivalent in English. – Midas Jul 25 '18 at 22:49
5

The Handbook of the IPA (1999, and online here) does not indicate any problem with this symbol (and it's hard to see how it could be in dispute, being a symbol with an arbitrarily-defined value). [ɧ] is clearly defined by the IPA as a pulmonic articulation comprising simultaneous [x] and [ʃ]. I think the dispute is as to whether or not this symbol is an accurate representation of the Swedish phoneme commonly written as /sj/. This phoneme varies greatly in its realisation, both across dialects of Swedish and between the allophones within each dialect.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    So the Wikipedia articles are in part wrong? In this case the problem is not the classification of the sound, but rather the IPA symbol itself? – Alenanno Feb 2 '12 at 10:01
  • @Alenanno I don't understand how the problem could be with the symbol? As an IPA symbol it represents the articulation/phone that it represents and nothing more. But if the symbol is used to represent a phoneme, then there's a problem, but the problem is with the choice of symbol, not with the symbol itself. – Gaston Ümlaut Feb 3 '12 at 1:20
  • yeah I think that's what I meant, sorry. My wording was not clear. You said that they don't agree this is the best symbol to represent that particular sound in Swedish... Is it because this symbol is already used for other sounds in other languages and so it might be confusing? – Alenanno Feb 3 '12 at 9:59
  • 2
    @Alenanno No, IPA symbols (as phonetic symbols) represent specific phones and so can be found (or not) in any number of languages. But IPA symbols can also be used to represent phonemes, and this is where there can be dispute. Phonemes are an abstraction across a set of phones, but one symbol has to be chosen to represent that phoneme. Its my understanding that in Swedish there has been uncertainty as to the phonetic realisation of the phoneme sometimes spelled /sj/, so it's not certain what's the best IPA symbol to use to represent the phoneme. – Gaston Ümlaut Feb 4 '12 at 2:13
  • /ɧ/ is a phonemic label only, phonetically this sound in Swedish is [ʃ], a velar fricative/approximant ([x]/|ɰ]) w/or without labialization or a bilabial fricative/approximant [ɸ]. In my experience the velar and bilabial phones can occur in free variation within the speech of the same individual. – Mario Elocio Apr 3 '14 at 22:09
0

The vast majority of Swedes represent this phoneme as [x], but there are a variety of other phonetic renderings as well. In addition, there are something like 40 ways to spell it, especially in foreign words.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.