In English, many adjectives support the -er ending to express a notion of exceeding:

  1. John is taller than Mary (is).
  2. Mary is smarter than John (is).

Of course, you can also have the more analytic construction:

  • Mary is more intelligent than John (is).

But with the notion of "does not exceed", less, only the analytic form is available:

  • John is less smart than Mary is.
  • John is less intelligent than Mary is.

Does any language express the less form using bound morphology the way we do with -er in (1) and (2)?

  • 1
    Didn't you mean "more analytic construction"?
    – Alenanno
    Commented Feb 6, 2012 at 20:39

4 Answers 4


A diminutive is not the same as what a "less" morpheme would be — it lacks comparative semantics.

However, to answer your question, the answer is, no there is not any such language which expresses a concept of "less" synthetically, at least none has been found despite a very large (300+ language) cross-linguistic survey by Jonathan Bobalijk. See his paper "Universals in Comparative Morphology", for his explanation of why such a morpheme never occurs.

  • 1
    In case you were referring to my answer: I know exactly what the difference is between the two; fearing that there was no answer, I provided some information that might be interesting for the OP, though of course it is not the same thing.
    – Cerberus
    Commented Feb 7, 2012 at 6:10
  • 1
    By the way, I excluded the languages I knew or could check (french, spanish, german) then asked around to native speakers of: Russian, Ungarian, Lithuanian, Swedish. But nothing came out. :)
    – Alenanno
    Commented Feb 7, 2012 at 10:16
  • 2
    So what does this paper have to say about Turkish -cE, I wonder? Commented Feb 7, 2012 at 22:49
  • 2
    ...and the answer is: Turkish was one of the languages surveyed and no "less" comparative was found; in fact, it says Turkish only has analytic degrees of comparison. Commented Feb 7, 2012 at 23:04
  • 2
    To my knowledge, Bobalijk is pretty good about acknowledging counterexamples to his claims (including problematic data from Basque and Russian for his analysis of regular comparatives). So, I would need to see a paper analyzing the -cE as a less comparative, to be convinced.
    – user325
    Commented Feb 7, 2012 at 23:29

In Turkish, the suffic "-cE" gives this meaning when added to adjectives, such as "güzelce". It means that the person or thing is less beautiful than the mentioned thing. For instance:

Annesi gibi güzelce bir kız

It means that she is less beautiful than her mother. However, in some contexts it can mean "nearly". I asked which meaning people think of when they hear words to which this suffix was added; they answered "less". However, this research is not very broad or scientific; I have only asked the people I could contact. Maybe this answer will help you to some extent.

I have found a paper about this suffix; however, the section related to it is very little and not very much detailed.

  • Please give a citation for this analysis of -cE?
    – user325
    Commented Feb 10, 2012 at 4:37
  • @Knitter, as I mentioned before, I do not have a scientific research, I have asked only the native speakers when I am suspect of this meaning as a native speaker. I will try to find a research about this topic, when I find, I will share it. Commented Feb 10, 2012 at 9:11
  • @Knitter, I cannot find a detailed research for the suffix; however, I find a little section in a paper for this meaning of the suffix. The language of the research is Turkish, so I have translated the related section. Commented Feb 18, 2012 at 10:49
  • The translation is: "the meaning of less": The suffix gives the meaning of less to the root. Initially, the meaning seems as "like,as"; however, in depth it is "less". Being an adjective or an adverb changes the meaning of the word. "topluca kız" [: the girl who is less fat], "topluca katıldık." [:we attended (the missind object) as a unity.], "fazlaca para". The link of the paper is web.ebscohost.com/ehost/… Commented Feb 18, 2012 at 11:09

Well, Krivoshein de Canese and Acosta Alcaraz' (2007:102) "Gramática Guarani" gives as "comparativo the inferioridad" ('inferiority comparative') the affix -ive, which attaches to the standard of comparison NP. Their example is "Susana omba'apo'ive Anagui" meaning 'Susana works less than Ana'. However, -i is a diminutive, and -ve is the comparative of superiority so... it seems that the meaning of inferiority is obtained compositionally from the superiority comparative...


I don't know any language that does exactly what you want; but it may interest you to know that the diminutive suffix -lus can be used with adjectives in Latin:

(1) aedes = room, house
(2) aedicula = little room or house

(1) acer = petulant
(2) acriculus = a little/bit petulant

What's behind this is that the distinction between nouns and adjectives was not felt to be very strict in Latin: acer can mean "petulant" or "a petulant person/thing". But the diminutive form can certainly be used when the word is used adjectivally/attributively, as in vir acriculus.

Note that this suffix is productive, but it is relatively uncommon—certainly less common than English forms with "less".

Derived suffixes that work the same way are -ulus, -culus, -(u)sculus, -(u)nculus, -illus, -ellus. They can all indicate a diminutive or a repeated action (as in credulus).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.