4

I had an argument with a friend, since he didn't find "claustrophilia" in the dictionary he thought it should be called a nonce word. I thought the term "nonce" was for one-off words that arose a single time by a single speaker, whereas a word constructed according to accepted productive rules of English like "claustrophilia", "Benghazigate", or "diphosphorus pentoxide" should not be classified as nonce words, even though they do not appear in your dictionary. But is there some other term that does describe words of this class?

  • 1
    Coinage, perhaps? – StoneyB on hiatus Nov 7 '15 at 20:51
  • Welcome to Linguistics SE! Good question. I'm not sure if there is a specific term for new words made specifically by regular productive rules, but certainly neologism or coinage are used to refer to "invented" words (which often are built by rules indeed). – Ivan Kapitonov Nov 8 '15 at 1:37
2

Neologism. Speaking for myself, though, ‘nonce’ is fine for things that are not strictly ‘one-off’. Everything starts with a first time, and 'accepted productive rules' are often precisely how a nonce word would arise, right? To the point that it seems odd to have a specific term for it.

| improve this answer | |
1

Nonce is used in two senses in linguistics: 1) an 'occasionalism' - word used in a one off conversation and 2) a non-existent word (non-word) following the phonological patterns of the language used as distractors or targets in psycholinguistic experiments.

In the first sense, 'nonce' is a type of neologism.

With rare words, it is difficult to exactly determine what term to apply them and ultimately, it's not that important. It would appear that at least one dictionary actually lists claustrophilia and it has some other hits on Google, so it's not clear if it's a neologism or just a very rare words that some people may 'recreate' independently. Therefore, the type of word is not just a property of the lexical item itself but rather of the interaction of the form, its history, speakers' knowledge of the word and the context of usage. Being able to describe what goes on is more important than the label.

| improve this answer | |
  • +1 for occasionalism. – Ivan Kapitonov Nov 8 '15 at 1:41
  • I've also heard it used to describe words like whatchamacallit, whozis, thingamajig, and the like, which we substitute for specific names and descriptions that we don't know or can't remember. – jlawler Nov 8 '15 at 16:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.