0

It seems like Feature Geometry doesn't make reference to Archiphonemes - only Underspecified Segments. Is there a theoretically-motivated reason for this, if it is true?

  • Feature Geometry itself does not even make reference to phonemes, although an individual practitioner might. The reason is that "phoneme" as opposed to "segment" has not proven useful. – user6726 Dec 4 '15 at 20:52
1

Trubetzkoy's archiphoneme theory had no reference to underspecified features, since it was proposed in a day before feature theory existed. The interpretation of archiphonemes as being underspecified segments is ahistorical. Most of Trubetzkoy's case studies of archiphonemes can reasonably be interpreted as involving underspecified segments, but there is no theoretical guarantee that they all can.

Maybe FG people want to make clear that their theory is more constrained than Trubetzkoy's (which I think would be correct). Or maybe they are just being fastidious and do not want to attribute to Trubetzkoy something he didn't actually propose.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.