0

When naming some number of objects, there's only one plural form in English (2 dogs, 3 dogs, 10 dogs). But in Slavic languages like Polish the form changes depending on the number (2 psy, 4 psy, 5 psów, 12 psów, 22 psy, 100 psów).

Does the form vary in Turkish? If so, what are the rules behind that?

2

In Turkish, a plural declension is not needed if the noun is modified by a numeral.

(If it is used, it is emphatic.)

In fact, it is not needed with any modifier that already implies plural.

arkadaş (friend)
arkadaşlar (friends)
bir arkadaş (one friend)
iki arkadaş (two friends)
birçok arkadaş (many friends, a lot of friends)
çok fazla arkadaş (too many friends)
sayıda arkadaş (numerous friends)

(Note all the situations in which -lar is not required.)

The same is true of Turkic languages generally, and of neighbouring languages, like Persian, Armenian and Georgian, from other language families.

| improve this answer | |
  • Persian and Armenian are from the same language family (Indo-European). – fdb Jan 9 '16 at 21:33
  • Georgian has it too, but my aim is not the list them all. The statement is valid as written, IMHO. – Adam Bittlingmayer Jan 10 '16 at 8:51
  • And fa and hy don't share this feature based on common Indo-European origin. – Adam Bittlingmayer Jan 10 '16 at 8:55
1

There is only one plural form in Turkish* but it's usage is quite different from English or the Slavic examples you give.

  • Dog = köpek
  • Dogs = köpekler

So far so good. That's the only plural form there is, but the trick is you only ever use it when you need a stand alone noun. Any time you precede the noun with a number or any other indication of quantity you actually use the singular form.

  • There is a dog in the street. = Sokakta köpek var.
  • There are two dogs in the street. = Sokakta iki köpek var.
  • There are lots of dogs in the street. = Sokakta çok köpek var.
  • There are dogs in the street. = Sokakta köpekler var.

Note only in the last example is the plural form used.

* The actual suffix could be -lar or -ler depending on vowel harmony rules but either way it's the same form.

| improve this answer | |
0

Wikipedia says "If a numeral is used with a noun, then the plural suffix is usually not used". (Unreferenced, unfortunately, but it agrees with my memory from when I studied Turkish.) So, no, neither the case nor the number of nouns changes with different numerals.

I believe the use of the genitive singular for (numbers ending in) 2, 3 or 4, as opposed to the genitive plural for larger numbers in Slavonic languages is generally regarded as a paucal form, a generalisation of the dual.

| improve this answer | |
0

Turkish has only one suffix for plural (* ler) and with the number of objects It doesn't change.

But as it is written many times above, Turkish has tendency to drop the plurals in most cases. This feature can be observed through the many proposed Altaic languages (Japanese, Mongolian etc.)

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.