I've recently stumbled on this site dedicated to teaching English as a second language to Portuguese speakers. Right at the beginning, while making a comparison among English and Portuguese phonologies, the author states the following:

In less compact languages, with a small number of 1-syllable words and a higher average of syllables per word, the number of phonemes does not need to be large and the difference between each vowel can be bigger. This is the case of Spanish (5 vowel phonemes) and Portuguese (7 vowel phonemes). English, however, is a language extremely economic in the use of syllables, very compact, with a large number of 1-syllable words. Naturally, this requires a larger number of vowel phonemes to supply the bigger "demand" of a system with a reduced number of possible combinations.

I confess I had never thought about that possible causal relation. In retrospect, though, it seems quite a reasonable (and almost self-evident) hypothesis. But, of course, it ultimately has to be validated by hard data. So, my question is: has that claim been confirmed? Namely, that "more compact languages" have more vowel phonemes than less compact ones?

  • Portuguese has more than 7 vowel phonemes. – Mechanical snail Aug 22 '12 at 23:32
  • @Mechanicalsnail What are these phonemes? – Otavio Macedo Aug 23 '12 at 16:20
  • What are the 7 vowel phonemes in Portuguese? I've read the Wikipedia article but found nothing about the number of vowels. – Anixx Sep 15 '15 at 12:14

In Daniel Nettle's 1995 paper Segmental inventory size, word length, and communicative efficiency the author takes a sample of 10 languages and demonstrates a correlation between mean word length and the number of segments.

From Nettle (1995:365)

Two follow-ups seem to verify this result:

Nettle (1996), Coevolution of phonology and the lexicon in twelve languages of West Africa

Wichmann et al (2011), Phonological diversity, word length, and population sizes across languages: The ASJP evidence.

However, none of these are indicative of a causal relation. As mentioned in this Linguist List discussion on Nettle 1995, Maori has a very limited segment inventory and their words are quite short.

One possible reason is that the metric of word length (either by segment or syllables) varies with morphosyntactic variability. A language may form predicates by using light verbs/phrases consisting of short words (dance -> do a fun move), in which case neither phonemic diversity nor word length are crucial components. It's also a methodological question what is measured by mean word length.

Syllable count can be a worse measure than word length because languages differ in how complex a syllable can be. A language with only open syllables ("sa") will need more segmental variety to convey the same amount of information with monosyllables than a language which allows complex onsets and codas ("sploink").

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.