7

I recently came across oeuvre, which in the two out of two times I've heard the word spoken (in an English context), sounded like it does in Merriam-Webster's online audio pronunciation, that is, with a vowel that does not occur in any other English word, loanword or otherwise. (As a side note, various other dictionaries seem to list some very peculiar pronunciations, together with hilariously pronounced audio samples that do not match the transcriptions.) On the other hand, a quick check here and here suggests that the word has really been around in English long enough to have gotten more Anglicized. Are there any other English words with /œ/, or other non-English phonemes? What would have to happen to qualify /œ/ as an English phoneme? Is there a name for the use of phonemes that are not part of a language?

  • 2
    The part of your question about English specifically would be best answered on English.SE I think. The more general question about linguistic borrowing of phonemes would be a good topic here though. Perhaps you could edit your question to focus on that last bit? – Mark Beadles Mar 25 '12 at 1:02
  • 1
    well i know that hors d'oeuvre has been pretty well nativized. – jlovegren Mar 25 '12 at 3:25
  • @jlovegren yes, and notably for the question, it's not pronounced [œ] in English unless one is hypercorrecting. – Mark Beadles Mar 25 '12 at 15:32
  • 1
    @jlovegren Interesting, are they truly using a coarticulated labial/velar or a [g][b] sequence? And if the latter, can we say that they've acquired a phoneme? – Mark Beadles Mar 25 '12 at 19:06
  • 1
    What about the /x/ phoneme for words of Celtic origin like loch. Some speakers of English do pronounce it with the /x/ and some with a /k/ so that loch and lock are homophones. Also in the British Isles placenames like Llanelli has /ɬ/ and this phoneme does remain for some speakers of English when pronouncing these words. – Danger Fourpence Mar 25 '12 at 21:30
5

A good question, but I'm afraid there's no good answer to it.

The phenomenon has been noticed by linguists some time ago, and we have two terms: loan words and foreign words. For the latter also the German term is sometimes used, Fremdwort (pl. Fremdwörter) -- incidentally, itself a good example of its own meaning. There is at least one more like that in English, namely menu. I don't know why it hasn't been adapted better. Maybe because it's a 'vocabulary word', maybe because there aren't many more like it, and maybe both.

But the second possibility is key here: the feeling of nativeness of a phoneme/word/anything is a function of its frequency. English native speakers don't perceive [œ] as native because it's only there in very few (possily just one) words, and not a very frequent one to that. As it is, it's a foreign word. If there were many more like it, they would become loan words.

Two examples:

  1. Polish originally did not have /f/. When the Latin name Stephanus was borrowed, it was adapted to Szczepan [ščepan]. But later many other words with /f/ have been borrowed and Poles began to perceive it as a native sound. The connection between Stephanus and Szczepan became obscure, and the name was borrowed again, yielding Stefan [stefan] this time. (Both exist in modern Polish and are seen as two separate names.)

  2. Turkish originally did not have either /f/ or /ž/. Since the 10th century, however, it has borrowed a large number of words with /f/ but only relatively few with /ž/. As a result, the former is now seen as a native sound much more than the latter.

So you can see that the distinction is a gradient and comes down eventually to the proportion. Unfortunately, no scale or mathematical formula seems to exist which would allow to specify the feeling.

The process is not limited to phonemes. I wrote "phoneme/word/anything" above. It's because this is how we perceive familiarity in general. In the 19th c., English purists attempted to convince the society to abandon French, Latin &c. loan words and thus 'purify' the language. The slogan they came up with was Use exclusively Anglo-Saxon monosyllables. In case you wondered, use is a borrowing from French.

  • 3
    Another example: English [ʒ] was in origin a borrowing from Norman French, although it's now thoroughly nativized. – Mark Beadles Mar 25 '12 at 15:47

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.