I know that the sentence "time flies like an arrow" could have lots of meaning and there is an ambiguity but I draw a tree and I got confused that which meaning is more suitable for this tree.




NP→ Det NN

NN→ time, flies, arrow

det→ an

v→ like

meaning 1)there exists a particular arrow x such that every time flies (a kind of insect) likes x.( many flies one arrow) meaning 2) for every every "time flies"(a kind of insect)y, there is an arrow x such that y likes x (many flies , one arrow per fly)


If you mean 'time flies' as you would mean 'fruit flies', then wouldn't 'time flies' have to be one NN, or 'time' to be a modifier? With your current phrase structure rules or lexicon you do not allow this interpretation. You'll have to add rules that either license a construction allowing 'time' to act as a modifier of 'flies', or change the lexicon.

  • Couldn't we say that Time is the name of the flies, then we need separate NN for that? – liza Apr 23 '16 at 19:22
  • would that not indicate that the two words are somewhat separate, rather than depending on each other's meaning? I suppose this raises the question, is Charles Dickens 1 NN or 2 NN? I would certainly say it is one - only one entity being described. – Dr. Paradise Apr 23 '16 at 19:59
  • Why is the leaf node called 'NN' instead of 'n'? – amI Aug 22 '16 at 19:47
  • I think it's just a convention in some NLP circles: I believe NLTK uses NN to tag a noun. On the other hand, some NLP classes use NN for 'nominal'. This choice is argued by Halliday and functional grammar, although some may argue that a nominal group is/is too similar to a noun phrase. Finally, in my natural language syntax classes we labelled our trees with just N for any noun. – Dr. Paradise Sep 2 '16 at 11:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.