2

I have a question about empty category PRO. I'd like to know if PRO is always bearing the same case as its controller, or not?

Are there any lingusitics laws that clames such a thing?

Many Thanks for all answers!

1
  • 2
    This is a question that depends on what the theoretician presupposed. Since empty category PRO is a non-terminal and therefore does not actually occur in speech, the identity of its case -- or whether it has any at all -- is entirely theoretical, and can be presupposed in any way that the theory constructor fancies. That's why there isn't a definitive answer; there are lots of different theories.
    – jlawler
    Jul 18 '16 at 16:16
1

My dissertation of the loss of infinitival complementation in Greek deals with this issue; in Greek syntax there is a process called case attraction. Case attraction also occurs in Icelandic, Hindi, Korean... so I mention these in the discussion. I examined Government-Binding (obviously for PRO) as well as Lexical-Functional Grammar and Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, looking at how well they could explain the synchronic variability and the diachronic patterns related to the variations. So I agree with Professor Lawler's comments that the theory really makes a difference here; in my dissertation, all of the theories had to explain how PRO became pro in Greek. Carole Chaski Syntactic Theories and Models of Syntactic Change: A Study of Greek Infinitival Complementation. Brown University PhD '87

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.