1

I'm using their list for a project that incorporates some techniques of authorship analysis. I don't know what to do with "it's", though. I obviously cannot ignore the apostrophe and count it as "its", nor should I simply tokenise the components because then I would be over-counting the ratio of "it" to "is".

The question is, then, do I count "'s" as equivalent to "is", or do I leave out all occurrences of "it's" altogether? Of course, I know I could do either, but what would be the better choice in terms of preserving statistical distinctions amongst authors? At the moment I'm inclined to count "'s" as equivalent to "is", but I don't have good reasons for it.

1

For your research question (authorship attribution) it is obviously the best to treat "it's" as a word of its own or as two words "it" and "'s". Whether a text has "it's" or "it is" may give you a clue who has authored it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.