3

Preferably as specific a term as possible (i.e. not applying to other phonological rules).

For example how English words can't begin with "ng" or how Spanish words can't begin with "st"

  • Please explain a bit in detail. Your question is fuzzy. Are you looking for the term in linguistics for phonological rules and sound change? – Midas Jan 9 '17 at 6:04
  • 1
    @Midas The linguistic term specifically relating to where certain sounds are allowed to occur within a language's words – FracturedRetina Jan 9 '17 at 6:07
  • fwiw your question needs clarification. English "words" can begin with"ng". "Nguyen" is the most common Vietnamese name and there are many Americans with that name. It is an ordinary American English name, by now. if it helps, the term "consonant cluster" might be useful. Arabic allows at most two consonants to cluster, English allows at least 4, maybe more ("extra", ekstra). Phonotactics is the name of the study of such phenomena. it is not the study of rules or laws, but of facts. – mobileink Jan 9 '17 at 22:42
  • But nobody pronounces orthographic ng the way it is in Vietnamese (or any other language). Any "study of phenomena" in science implies the study of underlying explanatory laws. – user6726 Jan 10 '17 at 0:07
  • @user6726: agreed, but the OP use the specific example of words beginning with "ng". Regarding "study of": empirical scientists study observable phenomena. the study of underlying laws is philosophy, not science, since we cannot observe such (putative) laws. empirical scientists may postulate underlying laws to explain observable phenomena; but that is not "study of" those postulations. – mobileink Jan 10 '17 at 20:57
5

The term you're looking for is phonotactics. From Wikipedia:

Phonotactics (from Ancient Greek phōnḗ "voice, sound" and taktikós "having to do with arranging") is a branch of phonology that deals with restrictions in a language on the permissible combinations of phonemes. Phonotactics defines permissible syllable structure, consonant clusters, and vowel sequences by means of phonotactical constraints.

| improve this answer | |
0

"Admissibility", according to Halle in "Phonology in Generative Grammar". Stampe has also used this term to refer to a theory of what words are permitted in the lexicon of a language with a given phonological system. Halle's early theory was that forms are lexically admissible when their addition keeps the grammar as simple as possible by not forcing the repeal of any lexical redundancy rules.

In SPE, there is proposed a way to measure distance from the lexicon of a potential new lexical entry by counting the symbols in the phonological rules that would be required to change the new entry into some preexisting lexical form. (I don't think this makes sense, because then the admissible forms, at distance zero, would be only those forms already in the lexicon.)

In Stampe's natural phonology, the admissible forms are those to which no process which could apply to an underlying form is applicable, and foreign words are made admissible during borrowing by applying such applicable processes. Processes which are prevented from applying directly to underlying forms by ordering constraints do not affect admissibility.

The term "phonotactics" comes from older taxonomic phonemics, and is generally used to refer to an enumeration of facts about the phonemic forms allowed in a language, without involving anything about the rest of the phonological system or how borrowing new forms into a language works. Generative phonology and Natural Phonology are in agreement that although linguists can invent "phonotactic rules", of course, there are no such rules in phonological systems.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.