2

Have you ever come across an example of a dually embedded content clause functioning as subject, such as

That that it works is obvious is disputed.

1
  • 1
    "That its working is obvious is disputed." "Its workings being obvious is disputed." "For its workings being obvious to be disputed is surprising."
    – Greg Lee
    Feb 19, 2017 at 18:40

1 Answer 1

3

It turns out that this type of embedding is discussed (and marked with #: semantically or pragmatically anomalous) in Huddleston & Pullum's CGEL in the section called 'Processing factors', pp 1405-6. Also, Pullum tells me that such examples are never found. "Fred Householder asserted in a couple of book reviews in Language that English has a surface constraint forbidding "that that". Terry Langendoen's view is that it's a processing matter: stashing two subordinators in a row as promissory notes for finite clauses that are to come is too much of a strain on the old processing box."

1
  • A surface constraint forbidding "that that" seems an overreach to me. I find sentences such as "I think that that she's innocent is beyond dispute" grammatical in speech, where the second that would have to start a new intonational phrase. But as H&P say, it's not possible for subjects. Apr 23, 2022 at 2:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.