1

While I think that I understand how tonal phenomena is meaningfully represented from an autosegmental perspective, I wonder about how other phenomena can be.

I remember reading a while ago about so-called "floating" features, like voice and nasal, that spread in some of the more "exotic" languages. Is there a paradigmatic example that illustrates the utility of autosegmental phonology to account for e.g. floating nasal or similar?

2

One of the canonical examples of "floating non-tonal feature" is [constricted pharynx] in the article "Emphasis harmony in a Modern Aramaic dialect" (Language 1984: 1-26). There are various analyses of non-tonal phenomena which make the assumption that those feature are "floating", but are equally amenable to a segmental treatment where a specific segment has the feature, and local assimilations apply (an example being Guarani nasalization).

There are analyses if vowel harmony in Maltese by Hume and a Palestinian Arabic dialect by Kenstowicz where features ([round], I believe) are set afloat and then reassociate, though I would not presently claim that no alternative is possible without reviewing the article. Another fairly classical case for floating features is rounding in Palatalization in verb inflection in Gurage lagugages.

These are all cases where paradigmatic mobility supports the case for floating no-final features, which are maximally like the strong case for autosegmental tone.

1
  • Tx! What is the "strong case for autosegmental tone"?
    – Teusz
    May 10 '17 at 5:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.