2

Words which have the sound sequence /s/-/t/-/r/ in standard Italian (and probably had that sequence in their Latin ancestor form) have a simple retroflex fricative in Sicilian, which is spelt "str", perhaps copying the Italian spelling of the word. Now I get how "r" could have become a retroflex /ɻ/, maybe due to external influences, and then /t/ could have been retroflected to /ʈ/ when near a /ɻ/, which in turn was devoiced to produce the affricate /ʈʂ/, spelt "tr" in Sicilian. I could even imagine "str" becoming /sʈʂ/ and then /ʂʈʂ/. But how did this turn to a simple /ʂ/? Is it actually the case that /str/>/stɻ/>/sʈʂ/>/ʂʈʂ/>/ʂ/? Or is the evolution different?

1

As far as I know, it's actually [ʂɻ] or [ʂɹ], not [ʂ]. Likewise, I read that "tr" and "dr" are actually [t͡ʃɹ~ʈ͡ʂɻ] and [d͡ʒɹ~ɖ͡ʐɻ] respectively, not [ʈ͡ʂ] and [ɖ͡ʐ]

It seems that in both Romance and Slavic languages, it is very common to turn the clusters /st͡ʃ/ into a simple /ʃ/. This happens in Russian with the <щ>, which originally represented /st͡ʃ/ or /ʃt͡ʃ/ (which it still does in Ukrainian), but eventually turned into /ʃː/. (I suspect the same thing happened to the Italian "sci" ). I believe this is what might have happened to the Sicilian - [str] ->[sʈ͡ʂɻ~ʂʈ͡ʂɻ] -> [ʂɻ]

| improve this answer | |
  • Adding a number of dialrcts with /stʃ/ (s'c in spelling) in Northern Italy, one may say that sound change is about as common as conservation of the cluster. Or maybe that cluster rearose later in those dialects? More research is needed, I guess. – MickG Jan 2 '18 at 15:35
  • So the r turns retroflex, the t/d assumilates and affricatizes, and in the case of str the s assimilates too and the cluster is simplified. Sounds sensible. Wikipedia should be notified of this "it's actually", since it gives what I wrote as the pronunciation of Sicilian tr dr str. – MickG Jan 2 '18 at 15:38
  • I conjecture that "maybe that cluster rearose later in those dialects" because the words with s'c that I can think of do not have sci but rather schi in Italian, and the words I can think of with sci don't have s'c but plain s (which at least in Romagnolo I am fairly convinced is apico-alveolar rather than the Italian lamino-alveolar s). (Couldn't edit it into comment one because the 5 mins of editing had passed when I finished writing) – MickG Jan 2 '18 at 15:43
  • [s] becomes [ʃ] immediately before "tr" and sometimes elsewhere before "r" in the local dialect of English here in Hawaii, for instance in "street". – Greg Lee Jan 2 '18 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.