1

In the exclamation That you be happy! what part of speech is the word that? Is it a conjunction via ellipsis, i.e. "(I wish) that you be happy!" If yes, then does this poke a hole in the idea that subordinating conjunctions necessarily introduce subordinate clauses?

  • 6
    IMO, "That you be happy!" is not grammatical in English. If you've found a speaker (even yourself) who uses such constructions non-jocularly, we'd need to know more about the grammar of "that" in such a dialect. For example, maybe in that dialect, "that" is not a complementizer. – user6726 Sep 22 '17 at 16:58
  • This question belongs on english.stackexchange.com – Mitch Sep 28 '17 at 23:27
  • ktm5124, IMHO your question is related to linguistics. You have only one comment, pointing out that it's not 'grammatical' (yeah, a typical English Stack Exchange answer, that is, having prescriptivist leanings) and one answer pointing out that it's a fragment, not a sentence. Neither is correct. 'That you be happy!' is valid English, and if anyone wants to say it isn't a sentence then I challenge them to define what a sentence is. It is illocutionarily restricted in its use (used for wishes or toasts, accompanied by gestures), but that doesn't disqualify it from being valid English. – Bathrobe Nov 27 '18 at 9:42
4

Your phrase is a fragment (not a sentence). It might occur as the answer to a question ("What do you want?"). 'That' is a complementizer -- it makes 'you be happy' the complement of 'what'. This is similar to the demonstrative pronoun function of 'this' or 'that', except that the antecedent is a phrase rather than something in the external environment.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.