1

It is well attested that the Sanskrit derivational suffix -ka for adjectives together with the syntesized participle on nominals like krta-ka>done, evolved as the possessive case marker in modern Indo-Aryan. My question is, is it possible that the -ka (apart from being possessive case marker) has extended its function as perfective aspect in any modern Indo-Aryan languages? If yes, how do I determine the stages of its evolution as perfective aspect? What should I read?

2
  • Can you please edit/elaborate on -> like krta-ka>done Oct 3 '17 at 7:32
  • Sanskrit root kr 'do' followed by the perfective participle form -ta means 'done', and by adding the derivational suffix for forming adjectives -ka it means the same 'done' only krtaka is an expanded variation of krta
    – user20110
    Oct 3 '17 at 17:51
1

Your presuppositions are faulty. Sanskrit kṛtaka is exactly what it is: a past passive participle from kṛ 'to do', followed by the adjectival suffix -ka. As such, it means 'the one who has been done'. Then, depending on the context, you can translate it in a number of ways, including a simple 'done', but this does not make it an "expanded variation of kṛta". It's another lexeme, not just a word-form of kṛ. Therefore, you can't search in the Modern Indo-Aryan languages for a continuation of something that did not exist in the Old Indo-Aryan.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.