1

When plotting the chart of the acoustic space of AmE vowels, we can represent F1 values on the y-axis and F2 values on the x-axis, like a chart on this site: http://sail.usc.edu/~lgoldste/General_Phonetics/Source_Filter/SFc.html

Alternatively, we can represent F1 values on the y-axis and F2-F1 values on the x-axis, like the chart on page 25: http://sail.usc.edu/~lgoldste/General_Phonetics/Source_Filter/SFc.html

It seems that the spatial distribution of vowels in the chart representing F2-F1 on the x-axis better resembles that in the IPA vowel chart, like the chart on this page: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/676/how-can-i-practice-differentiating-between-the-%C3%A6-and-%C9%9B-sounds-in-english-pho

I was wondering if this is true. And, if it is true, why?

  • This is IMO a distinct question: why is F2-F1 closer to an articulatory plot? The other question simply asks "why use F2-F1". Except the question has an error, since it's F2 that the difference replaces. – user6726 Apr 4 '18 at 16:03
  • @user6726: Oh, good point about the difference. Now I’m actually not sure about what this question is asking ... mooninnap, are you asking about the orientation of the chart? – brass tacks Apr 4 '18 at 17:05
  • @user6726 Thanks pointing out that error. I just corrected it. – chaoh Apr 4 '18 at 17:36
  • I'd actually never noticed this convention. Do you think that using F2-F1 does better resemble the classic chart? – Jeremy Needle Apr 4 '18 at 17:48
4

I don't entirely understand the why, but here is what I do know. The main reason for this convention is that F2-F1 gives a plot where the X axis better matches tongue position in back round vowels. The problem with bare F2 is that it makes vowels positions slope to the right as you go up (with [u o ɔ] not matching [ɯ ɤ ʌ]), but F2-F1 makes the back round vowels track actual tongue position, so that they slope to the left. The exact reason for this is somewhat mysterious to me.

Part of the mysterious nature of the relationship between formants, tongue position and vowel charts comes from the traditional habit of thinking of vowel articulations as being a governed by two independent factors. However, a lifetime of work by Fant and others has demonstrated that a better model is a tube with a constriction, so there is as a first approximation only one factor (the second approximation adds differences in tube length, as a function of lip protrusion).

Rounding lengthens the tube, which lowers all formants. The effect of rounding is greatest on F2, and it is greatest in back vowels. This bit of subtractive magic has the effect of "figuring out" what the lowering contribution of rounding is, and mostly removing it from the vowel plot. What is left, then, is an X value more based on tongue position, rather than the total length of the front tube.

| improve this answer | |
  • Thank you! This is helpful information. But isn't the effect of rounding greatest on F3, as languages like French and Dutch utilize F3 to distinguish rounded versus unrounded vowels? – chaoh Apr 5 '18 at 16:54
  • I was referring to just the standard vowel-plot formants, where rounding has more of an effect on F2. I don't actually know of any graphic standard for bringing F3 into the chart. – user6726 Apr 5 '18 at 17:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.