6

University student, beginning to learn about corpora, developing a research question for an assignment. There may well be linguistic concepts and terminology that already cover this idea and that I am not aware of. I would appreciate any knowledge about this that you can give me.

My idea is to use diachronic corpora to try to determine a usage threshold, or point of no return, below which words typically do not survive in a language.

An example: Pronominal adverbs in English are mostly used as techinical jargon (e.g. herinafter), archaic (hereunto) or part of everyday English (therefore). I analyzed these types of words in NGRAM viewer and noticed that, since the 1560s "therefore" has never fallen below the 1/100ths usage percent and hereunto has never risen above the 1/1,00ths. I'm aware NGRAM may not be the best corpus for this.

Have any studies been published that suggest a usage amount that typically determines if a word will become archaic, or obsolete?

5
  • Sorry there is a typo in my question "hereunto" has never risen above the 1/1,000ths.
    – tom
    Jun 6, 2018 at 17:20
  • 2
    You can edit your posts to correct typos and add stuff. Jun 7, 2018 at 16:19
  • I suspect that numbers would be different for different parts of speech. Jun 8, 2018 at 0:25
  • Also, there may be different reasons for low frequency besides archaism. It might be the opposite, a neologism, or slang, regionalism, technical jargon, etc. Jun 8, 2018 at 0:30
  • Thanks for the reply. The 1st part of speech that I am investigating is pronominal adverbs, like hereinafter, whereby and thereunto, so they are not new, slang, they stem from PGmc - therefore = dafuer in German and yes I would agree that most of this class has been restricted to legal jargon today, but again I would argue that is because the majority of this word class has become archaic or obsolete (aside from in Legal English). So, why did a handful of these enter into common English? This idea is probably unique enough that I won't get hit for plagarism right? It hasn't yet been done?
    – tom
    Jun 8, 2018 at 18:15

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.