1

Please excuse the fact that I'm not an academically trained Linguist.

I am working on a computer program with example sentences and their equivalents in different languages.

The idea I am trying to explore is that by compiling a list of example English sentences that encapsulate common speech patterns, having a native of another language add their language equivalents will give us a list of foreign sentences that encapsulate the same meta-grammar concepts.

For example:

English <-> Turkish

grammatical categories: present tense.

  • Joe is coming <=> Joe geliyor

grammatical categories: present tense, with.

  • I'm walking with her <=> Onunla yürüyorum

grammatical categories: present tense, with, together.

  • I am doing it together with Kayla <=> Kayla'yla beraber yapıyoruz

grammatical categories: present tense, interrogative.

  • Are you running? <=> Koşuyor musun?

I've been using https://glossary.sil.org/term/grammatical-category as a reference, but it's not quite what I'm after.

I'm getting stumped very easily. For example, I don't know what to call the grammatical categories appearing in these sentences:

  • Ders çalışmak zor <=> It is hard to study
  • Bulmak kolay <=> It is easy to find
  • Gitmek zor It is hard to go

My questions are as follows:

  1. What I naively refer to as grammatical categories, am I using the right term, or is there a more suitable academically recognised title for such an idea?
  2. Can you suggest any tips or ideas on how I can identify the grammatical categories in a sentence pattern?
  • 1
    1. Yes, you're doing fine. 2. No, it's your theory, so make up whatever categories seem to work best. – Greg Lee Aug 28 '18 at 15:17
1

This is a very broad question, and a difficult one, too.

It is difficult, because languages differ in the grammatical categories that are obligatorily expressed, and they differ in how the categories are exactly defined. For a cross-linguistic approach, I suggest reading something about Universal Dependencies, a currently hot proposal for unified tags across different languages.

When you have digested that, you can probably come up with more specific questions.

  • Very interesting! I've been reading through pages on Universal Dependency. How does it relatre/compare to [Natural Semantic Metalanguage](en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_semantic_metalanguage ), are they competing schools of thought? – talkingtoaj Aug 28 '18 at 15:40
  • 1
    No relation at all, Universal Dependencies deals with grammatical categories, Natural Semantic Metalanguage deals with semantics, so the two things have different domains. – jknappen Aug 28 '18 at 15:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.