2

Whenever I look up a transcription for a word containing [o], it's either an [oɪ] diphthong or an [oʊ] diphthong. Is it not possible to pronounce [o] without gliding through [ʊ] too? Is it possible, but English simply doesn't do it? Or, do monophthong [o] words actually exist in English, and I simply haven't been able to find them? EDIT: This question regards any dialect of English.

| improve this question | |
  • Which dialect of English? Each one has different vowels. – curiousdannii Sep 20 '18 at 11:48
  • 1
    @curiousdannii For both British and American. – abcjme Sep 20 '18 at 12:30
  • 1
    @abcjme you should edit the question to reflect that – ubadub Sep 20 '18 at 16:12
  • 2
    This is an incredibly useful and informative resource whenever you want to find how English accents around the world realize words. (Take it with a grain of salt, though, because the transcriptions are very narrow, they rely on one speaker per accent, and the words are said in careful speech, not casual.) – Nardog Sep 20 '18 at 16:43
  • 2
    If you like that, check out the George Mason Accent Archive. Includes native dialects and foreign dialects of English, transcribed in IPA and identified as to location and language background. – jlawler Sep 20 '18 at 19:06
4

In Standard American English and Standard British English, no. /o/ is always realized as a diphthong, primarily [oʊ], or [o] may appear in other diphthongs, e.g. [oɪ] although this is usually closer to [ɔɪ]. In some dialects of English, notably Indian English and I believe some types of Caribbean English too, /o/ can be realized as a monophthongal [o].

| improve this answer | |
  • 6
    Monophthongal /o/ is a notable feature of Scottish English and Geordie. Also found in Welsh English and North-Central American English. – Nardog Sep 20 '18 at 16:36
  • 1
    So does WE. Notice the words "also found". ;) – Nardog Sep 20 '18 at 16:38
  • 2
    @abcjme That difference is just convention. Phonemic notations (in slashes) and phonetic transcriptions (in brackets) are two entirely different beasts. You should look up the differences. I recommend this article as a starter. – Nardog Sep 20 '18 at 16:46
  • 1
    In American English lects, there is normally a fairly pure [o] before [ɹ], where /o/ and /ɔ/ neutralize (i.e, there is no contrast in these lects between /or/ and /ɔr/). This neutralization is similar to that among /e/, /ɛ/, and /æ/ before /r/, as in Mary, merry, marry, which are only distinguished in N. America in New England; the rest of us pronounce them identically. – jlawler Sep 20 '18 at 19:11
  • 1
    @Nardog I meant "x" as a variable. I now realize how confusing that was of me. I was just asking about [] and // in general. – abcjme Sep 22 '18 at 15:06
2

According to the table in Wiktionary Appendix:English pronunciation words like not are pronounced using ɒ,ɔ or ɒ and words like force are pronounced using ɔː, oː oɹ, ɔɹ similar to words like horse (depending on the dialect of English).

So if you require o and do not allow ɔ there is still the possibility of the long oː or the o before an ɹ.

| improve this answer | |
  • @ Vladimir F Ah, but even then, as a monophthong, it's strange that it must be long, or followed by an approximant. Are there are no circumstances in which a regular-length monophthong "o" can be followed by a consonant? – abcjme Sep 20 '18 at 12:34
  • 1
    @abcjme This is because of open syllable lengthening in Middle English, around the 13th century – Michaelyus Sep 20 '18 at 16:24
  • @abcjme The tendency for the shorter vowel to be lax is still current across British & American English (compare the vowels of FLEECE and KIT, PUT and BOOT), but also Standard German and Dutch. – Michaelyus Sep 20 '18 at 16:30
2

Words like load, go, row are sometimes treated as having the phonological vowel /o/. That is a phonemic analysis of the where vowels are tense or lax, so we have the opposition i/ɪ, e/ɛ, u/ʊ, o/ɔ. Phonetically, it is usually recognized that the mid vowels are diphthongs, written as [ei], [ɛɪ] or [ɛi] among others. I think the phonetic facts support [ɛɪ, ɔʊ] over the competitors. The quality [ɔ] also occurs before [ɹ] as in "core". There are American and British dialects (spoken in the north, in both cases) where "goat" is [go:t]. I can't say that there isn't a dialect where short o in got, rot, sop is phonetic [o], but I haven't heard of one. I would say that short monophthongal [o] is non-existent in English.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I think OP means the phonetic realization, not the letter nor the phoneme – ubadub Sep 20 '18 at 16:07
  • 1
    @ubadub At the second glance, now it seems the question is whether a monophthongal [o] is found in English, not the phoneme /o/. Otherwise it doesn't make sense to mention "oɪ". – Nardog Sep 20 '18 at 16:15
  • Yes, that seems clear. – ubadub Sep 20 '18 at 16:16
  • 2
    And yet, people frequently confuse the two kinds of analysis, so as a public service it is best to clarify the difference, when a question leaves open the intended analysis. – user6726 Sep 20 '18 at 16:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.