I am learning Stanford CS224N: natural language processing with Deep Learning.

Chris said "a little bit broken formal languages" in Lecture 1.

what does that mean? can any one give a concrete example to illustrate the difference between "formal languages" and "broken formal languages".

  • Could he have been talking about pseudocode? What was the context? – jlawler Apr 13 '19 at 17:03
  • he is talking about human language for preparation of talking about natural language processing. – shi95 Apr 13 '19 at 22:03
  • 6
    This is not jargon, it's just a common-English use of the word "broken". The full sentence is "But for a lot of people [referring to computer scientists] you've, like, spent your life looking at formal languages and the impression is that, sort of, human languages are somehow a little bit broken formal languages." Broken isn't a technical term here, it just means "not working right" - he's saying that natural language can be seen as a formal language that is "a little bit broken" i.e., a language that doesn't quite follow the rules a formal language is expected to. – Mark Beadles Apr 13 '19 at 22:17
  • The last edit by @fuDL added an entirely different question "which formal languages rule does human language break?" fu DL, if you have a different question, please ask it as a separate question instead of editing someone else's to add your own. – Mark Beadles Apr 15 '19 at 15:54

agreed with Mark Beadles's comments. Human language is a kind of broken formal languages because Human language doesn't quite follow the rules a formal language is expected to.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.