Are there any languages some of whose verbs require more than three arguments? I was thinking of causative constructions, such that "Mike had John give Sally the ring" could be expressed with one clause.
I have heard the term "tritransitive" for verbs that are said to take four arguments. One example in English is this
She(1) bet me(2) ten euros(3) that they won't show up(4). As you can see, this is different from your example with causatives, because the fourth argument taken by the main verb
bet is the whole that-clause. If I recall correctly, causative constructions have been analyzed as having only two or exactly three arguments. A problem for the analysis of any construction with regard to argument structure is to determine whether two or more arguments are taken by the same predicate, and thus are coarguments. You need syntactic and semantic evidence to prove that a verb can have four arguments, and as far as I know, causatives are not part of that kind of verbs. I'm sorry I can't tell you anything else about argument structure outside Germanic and Romance linguistics.
1"bet" is a funny one. There's also "She(1) bet me(2) ten euros(3) on Shergar(4a) to place(4b)". You need something in position 4a. If you don't add smething in position 4b it is generally assumed that 4b is "to win". Strictly speaking, you only need 1 and 4a for the sentence to make sense. Mar 10, 2013 at 11:45
From a Japanese language example corpus (I'm not a native speaker myself): 僕が彼より雑誌を多く売ることに彼と１ドル賭けた。I wagered him a dollar that I'd sell more magazines than he would. So we have が for a subject に for the outcome と for the person gambled with and the amount bet is an object (but lacks a particle I think because it is a quantity). Feb 20, 2021 at 23:04