1

I'm trying to understand what is a completely schematic construction in cognitive grammar. I found an example: VP --> V NP

So, is that a construction that can be easily described by a general rule and where you have the freedom to replace a lexical item by another one of the same category?

  • 1
    If you use only arbitrary symbols, you are describing the construction by a general rule. What that rule is, and what it means is not clear, but any symbol divorced from real data can be described as "completely schematic", I suppose, though that's not a standard description. – jlawler Jan 18 at 0:29
1

A schematic construction in CG is one with a very general meaning and with free slots that can be filled with lexemes compatible with it. A canonical case is the English Ditransitive Construction S OBJ1 OBJ2 whose sense is intended or successful transfer, as in "John gave Peter a book". As you see, the sense is kept very general in order to also accommodate less prototypical instances such as "She promised me a nice surprise".

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.