Linguistics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional linguists and others with an interest in linguistic research and theory. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
In my native English, the first argument in "Mary feeds her pigs" stands for an agent, and the second stands for a patient.
But what about the arguments in reflexive and reciprocal clauses in single-argument clauses? In the following two sentences, each argument seems to stand for an agent and a patient simultaneously.
Mary fed herself. Mary and Dean hugged each other.
Is there a single-word semantic term for things that are simultaneously agents and patients?
I cannot answer for reflexives, but for reciprocals the term reciprocants is often used. A problem with this term (and the term reciprocity) is that it is used for both meaning and form. For this reason Martin Haspelmath (2007, 'Further remarks on reciprocal constructions', in Nedjalkov (ed.), Reciprocal Constructions), argues to reserve reciprocity and reciprocants for the formal plane and mutuality / mutual relations and the corresponding mutuants for the semantic plane.
I am American and lived in France for six years. Reflexive verbs in French have a construct-eg se laver: to wash oneself. "se" and oneself appear to be a construct to explain the action. I would reason that the subject is both the agent and the patient.
