Why are Proto-Germanic *fraiwą and Old Norse frjó / fræ (oblique stems frjóvi / frævi) cognate? I don't understand why are PGmc ai and Old Norse / æ cognate?

enter image description here

The part of the table "History of Old Norse and Old Icelandic vowels" from here

  • next to a possibly regular development (try Fulk's grammar) consider possible conflation with *fri(j)on- "to love", frja, *fri(j)ond- "friend", frændi (cp. Ger. f. Freundin "girlfriend"), unclear *frija- "free", no ON, deemed secondary "... from 'related', a shift that points to a clan-based societal system." (Kroonen 2013); further perhaps *froi- "early", no ON (AGr. proios; cp. eg. Jungfrau "virgin; young-woman" for semantics, Frühling "spring"; breakfast ~ G Frühstück vs to break-in ~ G einweihen?); *frawa- "quick, light", extended meaning "joy"; *fraujan- "lord"…
    – vectory
    Aug 25 '20 at 11:01
  • I hadn't recognized *fraiwa "seed", assuming "wife" instead, viz Ger. Frau. Oops! It's still relevant because Kroonen (2013: *fraiwa-) in face of an uncertain etymology rejects 'praegnans', 'parere' or *sper- "to sow", and compares Freyr "fertility deity" < *frauja-, what's elsewhere from *fraujan- "lord" [en.WP], like Frau. But K'13 follows ON frjar, frjor, fraer, Icel. frjor adj. "fertile, prolific" < *fraiwa- with maybe metathesis from *frawja-, further implying ON frygð "blossoming, excellence", pace en.wt: "joy; lust" maybe MLG vröchde (cp. fruit < … < *bhruHg-?).
    – vectory
    Aug 25 '20 at 12:19

The development of Proto-Germanic ai in the North Germanic languages is very complex. It depends on a number of factors (stressed/unstressed, followed by w, r/R, h etc.) - see e.g. Sandøy 2017

PGmc. ai > Proto-Norse æi (Fulk 2018: 70), which further developed into:

  • ǣ (before w) (Heusler 1921: 28);
  • ā (before r, h) (this ā further developed into ē in the i-umlaut environment);
  • ei (in OWN) or ē (OEN) (Versloot 2017: 285);

In your post, you ask about frǽ (and its variant frjó; Zoega 1926 says that fræ was "sometimes in old MSS. spelt freo or frjó (q.v.), but less rightly").

As you can easily notice, we have w after the diphthong in PGmc, which means PGmc ai developed into æ in Old Norse (see above), cf. Fulk 2018: 70

"In addition, Proto-Norse æi developed to ON æ (i.e., /æː/) before w (which might be lost, §6.14), as in *aiwīn- > OIcel. ævi ‘age’ (cf. Go. aíws < *aiwaz) and hræ ‘corpse’ (cf. Go. hraíw)."

Note: the acute and the macron are used interchangeably here, to indicate length.

  • Is there a difference between the acute and the macron? I'm used to acutes indicating length in transcribed Old Norse, but it seems like there's a distinction here.
    – Draconis
    Aug 25 '20 at 22:38
  • 1
    @Draconis hmm, I meant for the acute to show length, nothing else. Trying to fix it now :)
    – Alex B.
    Aug 25 '20 at 22:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.