0

I came across this on http://sanskritdictionary.com/:

kubera kuberaḥ, yakṣarāṭ, yakṣendraḥ, yakṣeśvaraḥ, tryambakasakhā, guhyakeśvaraḥ, manuṣyadharmā, dhanadaḥ, dhanādhipaḥ, kinnareśaḥ, vaiśravaṇaḥ, paulastyaḥ, naravāhanaḥ, ekapiṅgaḥ, aiḍaviḍaḥ, śrīdaḥ, puṇyajaneśvaraḥ NOUN

yakṣānāṃ rājā yaḥ indrasya kośādhyakṣaḥ asti।

kuberaḥ rāvaṇasya bhrātā āsīt।

Here is the screenshot: enter image description here

Is Indra grammatically irregular, so the "n," does not transform like normal? If so it would make his names easier to pronounce.

I also asked this here: https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/43148/is-indra-grammatically-irregular

Edit: Text of screenshot by Severus Snape

  • 2
    What do you mean by “transform like normal”? Apart from containing the genitive of the name Indra in the quote, I don’t see what the image has to do with your question. Also, despite what the comment to your question on Hinduism said, questions about the grammar of specific, individual languages is unfortunately considered off-topic here on Linguistics. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Oct 11 at 17:05
  • See the final rule in this: ubcsanskrit.ca/lesson3/sandhirules.html. A regular word would have the "n" transform. – Aupakarana Abhibhaa Oct 11 at 19:46
  • Do you mean that the n न should become retroflex ण? If so, there's no reason that would happen in this word, as it isn't preceded by any of the sounds that trigger that rule. – TKR Oct 11 at 20:15
  • The sibilant ṣ/ष्, triggers the transformation according to ubcsanskrit.ca/lesson3/sandhirules.html. – Aupakarana Abhibhaa Oct 11 at 20:17
  • 1
    This is because internal sandhi rules don't usually apply across elements of a compound. – TKR Oct 11 at 21:18
1

The rule applies to /n/ only when immediately followed by a vowel or /n m y v/. In Indra, grantha etc. /n/ is followed by the wrong kind of segment, therefore the rule is inapplicable, regardless of the question of compounding.

| improve this answer | |
  • Where is that restriction from? This site with the rules elaborated upon shows no such restriction: sanskrit-trikashaivism.com/en/…. Also, grantha is already irregular, unless it is a Tatpuruṣa as well, as the "n," should transform into either " Anusvāra" or " Anusvāra + s," depending on if it is at the word or not. (Use control f and "n" to find the relevant rules quickly.) – Aupakarana Abhibhaa Oct 12 at 1:03
  • It's in Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar (the standard English reference grammar). Try to locate any example of /n/ changing before /t th d dh. – user6726 Oct 12 at 1:16
  • Interesting. I will check it out. – Aupakarana Abhibhaa Oct 12 at 18:42
  • Wait. Any appearance of n immediately before those examples has to be irregular or a Tatpuruṣa compound otherwise a previous rule of Sandhi would trigger first and transform it into either " Anusvāra" or " Anusvāra + s," meaning internal Sandhi can't apply to them, but not because of a rule by itself, just because of the interactions of the rules of Sandhi. – Aupakarana Abhibhaa Oct 12 at 21:08
  • Thus, regardless of internal Sandhi Indra has to be irregular or a Tatpuruṣa compound. That ties up my original question neatly. Thanks for the reference though. – Aupakarana Abhibhaa Oct 12 at 21:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.