3

I'm still confused about the difference between these two concepts. Could you explain it with some examples? Thank you in advance!:)

5
  • 3
    This question is broad enough to be answered in textbook chapters or even whole books, not a few sentences in a Stack Exchange post. Which textbook are you using for your class? Have you checked there? If yes, what specifically are you unsure about? – lemontree Oct 21 '20 at 11:47
  • 1
    An answer to the question can be found in e.g. H. de Svart "Introduction to natural language semantics" ch. 5, J. Lyons "Linguistic semantics" ch. 7.3, or E. Zimmermann & W. Sternefeld "Introduction to semantics" ch. 3.4. – lemontree Oct 21 '20 at 18:10
  • @lemontree♦ Thank you for your kind reply! Actually I'm reading Chapter 4 Case of HNG. Understanding Minimalism, but it's too overwhelming to me. I'll check out what you recommended. I'm really appreciative! :) – ronghe Oct 27 '20 at 3:25
  • 3
    If you want to come more from the syntactic side, you could also give S. Müller "Grammatical Theory" ch. 3.1.3, A. Carnie "Sytax: A Generative Introduction" ch. 12 .2-12.3, L. Haegman "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" ch. 9 or A. Radford et. al. "Linguistics: An Introduction" ch. 23 a try. – lemontree Oct 27 '20 at 11:26
  • @lemontree♦ That's so considerate of you! Thank you very much! :) – ronghe Oct 27 '20 at 13:38
3

They are special terminology from the Y model.

  DS
   | (overt movement)
  SS
 / | (covert movement)
PF LF

Today it is more common to draw a kind of T model.

     |
     |
LF __SO__ PF

No Deep Structure (DS) in the T model. Surface Structure is nowadays called Spell-out and is rather a point in the derivation (a point in time) than a representational level. There is "before" and "after Spell-out" rather than "at Surface Structure".

3
  • Sorry I forgot to add examples for you. Quantifier raising for example can be analyzed as being the difference between what you hear (aka Surface Structure) and LF. – purlupar Oct 28 '20 at 1:59
  • Thank you so much for your kind reply!:) Now I get it! – ronghe Oct 30 '20 at 5:11
  • 1
    You're welcome -- see also this answer linguistics.stackexchange.com/a/6016/4904 about "base generation" -- very much related. – purlupar Oct 31 '20 at 2:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.