For the word classification, would it break down to 'class-ify-ation' or 'class-ify-ic-ation'. I am confused between the two because for the second one, classific isn't a word.
1 Answer
Well Nicholas, depending on your point of view, you were either very lucky or unlucky to choose the word classification.
I am confused between the two because for the second one, classific isn't a word.
You're right, it isn't. Here's how I would break down classification
:
class
-ify
-[c]ation
root
-suffix
-suffix
You see, although the final suffix is -ation
, a c
is inserted to produce -cation
. This is a type of sound change and this phenomena is more commonly known as epenthesis.
It can occur when there is friction between the end of stem and the initial sound of the following suffix.
Just try saying classify
-ation
. Classifyaytion? Classifiation?
So, as a general rule, stems ending in y are transformed:
- The y becomes an i.
- the head of the
-ation
suffix receives ac
, becoming-cation
.
Now as for how to treat the sound change, there isn't really an agreed upon convention. In fact, that link from above treats -ation
and -cation
as distinct suffixes. So it's kind of up to you.
You could ignore the emergence of the c if you are insistent on doing a more canonical breakdown:
class
-ify
-ation
Or you could match the spelling:
class
-ifi
-cation
Or you could do as I did and mark the [c]
as a part of the final suffix and not a suffix in its own right:
class
-ify
-[c]ation
It's entirely up to you.