3

The /k/ in the word "cool" is often labialized i.e. round lips and is transcribed as [kʷ]. How do linguists say its name in phonetics?

  • Voiceless labialized velar plosive

or

  • labialized voiceless velar plosive

?

Are both interchangeable or there is a difference?

2
  • 3
    They both mean the same thing and you'll be understood either way, but intuitively I'd usually prefer the second to the first because voice feels like a more "fundamental" feature than labialization so you'd normally want it closer to the noun. That's just a feeling, though. – Cairnarvon Dec 1 '20 at 15:15
  • 1
    I agree with @Cairnarvon, but my reason is that "voiceless velar plosive" is a meaningful phoneme description in English -- you can substitute "/k/" without changing anything -- whereas "labialized velar plosive" isn't. So I'd go with the general term plus a particular modification added at the beginning: labialized voiceless velar plosive, aka labialized /k/, aka [kʷ]. – jlawler Dec 1 '20 at 18:12
4

It's traditional in phonetics to give a ᴠᴏɪᴄᴇ, ᴘʟᴀᴄᴇ ᴍᴀɴɴᴇʀ (VPM) label in the description of consonants. This kind of label corresponds to the entry that such a consonant would have according to the International Phonetic Association IPA chart. So you can think of the VPM label as a kind of name for that type of consonant. Any further phonetic detail, for example devoicing, labialisation, nasalisation, usually comes before the VPM label. In other words, it functions as a modifier (think descriptor) of the more general three part name for that consonant. (I am not implying that the VPM label constitutes a compound noun.)

So we would normally expect to see:

  • labialised voiceless velar plosive
  • retracted voiceless velar plosive

and so forth.

Notice that non-pulmonic consonants, for example ejectives, can be considered to indicate different manners than would be denoted by the same symbol without the diacritic. So the ejective [t'] is often described as a voiceless alveolar ejective, instead of as an ejective voiceless alveolar plosive.

There are doubtless other anomalies that I haven't considered.

1
  • Fascinating answer!! Thanks ;-) – Sphinx Dec 2 '20 at 11:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.