2

There seems to be a general consensus that classical Egyptian had four "guttural" or "H-like" phonemes: h (building, /h/), (wick, /ħ/), (placenta?, /x/), and (animal's belly, /ç/). And the main works that I've seen exploring the historical phonology (e.g. Loprieno) haven't proposed any additional ones, to my knowledge.

However, the documentation for CLTK's MdC transliterator seems to mention a fifth:

Small and Capital H5: almost exclusively used for transliterating demotic script.

What is "H5"? Is this a different name for one of the "standard" phonemes, or a new discovery, or a fringe theory that isn't accepted by the mainstream? Or something else entirely?

1
  • 1
    The Wikipedia page on Demotic depicts this as h with circumflex below h̭ but it doesn't give pronunciations of any of the letters. Commented Dec 20, 2020 at 12:30

1 Answer 1

2

"H5" or "fifth H" is generally transcribed either "h̭" or "ḫ₂", and represents what's very likely a phonemic split in later Egyptian.

At a certain point, Egyptian starts being written in two different ways in group-writing: when it's written with the sign on its own ("ḫ₁"), it corresponds to ϩ in Sahidic Coptic, and when it's written with followed by dual strokes ("ḫ₂"), it corresponds to Sahidic ϣ. For example, ḫr "road" is written with ḫ₁ in group-writing and leads to ϩⲓⲣ in Sahidic, while mḫr "box" is written with ḫ₂ in group-writing and leads to ⲙϣⲓⲣ in Sahidic.

In Demotic, the two are written with different glyphs (descending from the old hieratic uniliteral with and without dual strokes), so Demoticists have given them different transcriptions: versus . And given the Sahidic evidence, they do seem to have been phonemically different. But the nature of the distinction isn't entirely clear—the dual strokes may have been used as a generic diacritic to indicate "something is different about this sound" in group-writing—and I haven't found any suggestion for how they might have been pronounced. So if someone finds such a suggestion, please do add another answer!

1
  • (My main source for this is Kilani's Vocalisation in Group Writing: A New Proposal.)
    – Draconis
    Commented Mar 4, 2021 at 18:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.