2

There seems to be a general consensus that classical Egyptian had four "guttural" or "H-like" phonemes: h (building, /h/), (wick, /ħ/), (placenta?, /x/), and (animal's belly, /ç/). And the main works that I've seen exploring the historical phonology (e.g. Loprieno) haven't proposed any additional ones, to my knowledge.

However, the documentation for CLTK's MdC transliterator seems to mention a fifth:

Small and Capital H5: almost exclusively used for transliterating demotic script.

What is "H5"? Is this a different name for one of the "standard" phonemes, or a new discovery, or a fringe theory that isn't accepted by the mainstream? Or something else entirely?

1
  • 1
    The Wikipedia page on Demotic depicts this as h with circumflex below h̭ but it doesn't give pronunciations of any of the letters. – jk - Reinstate Monica Dec 20 '20 at 12:30
1

"H5" or "fifth H" is generally transcribed either "h̭" or "ḫ₂", and represents what's very likely a phonemic split in later Egyptian.

At a certain point, Egyptian starts being written in two different ways in group-writing: when it's written with the sign on its own ("ḫ₁"), it corresponds to ϩ in Sahidic Coptic, and when it's written with followed by dual strokes ("ḫ₂"), it corresponds to Sahidic ϣ. For example, ḫr "road" is written with ḫ₁ in group-writing and leads to ϩⲓⲣ in Sahidic, while mḫr "box" is written with ḫ₂ in group-writing and leads to ⲙϣⲓⲣ in Sahidic.

In Demotic, the two are written with different glyphs (descending from the old hieratic uniliteral with and without dual strokes), so Demoticists have given them different transcriptions: versus . And given the Sahidic evidence, they do seem to have been phonemically different. But the nature of the distinction isn't entirely clear—the dual strokes may have been used as a generic diacritic to indicate "something is different about this sound" in group-writing—and I haven't found any suggestion for how they might have been pronounced. So if someone finds such a suggestion, please do add another answer!

1
  • (My main source for this is Kilani's Vocalisation in Group Writing: A New Proposal.) – Draconis Mar 4 at 18:26
-1

An answer can be found here bottom of page 3
https://oi.uchicago.edu/sites/oi.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/shared/docs/saoc45.pdf

4
  • 3
    This answer has several issues: It is a link only answer that becomes void when the linked resources is moved or completely taken from the net. And, the main question on pronunciation is not answered in the linked resource. – jk - Reinstate Monica Dec 20 '20 at 17:23
  • Interesting; so if I'm understanding right, "H5" represents a ligature of the placenta(?) and the y-strokes, which became /x/ in Akhminic and /ʃ/ in other dialects, but never /h/? So possibly a palatalized /x/ or /ç/ or the like? – Draconis Dec 20 '20 at 17:25
  • Apparently, H5 is used to transliterate a particular sign of Demotic. This does not means H5 is a particular phoneme. – Arnaud Fournet Dec 20 '20 at 20:16
  • 3
    @ArnaudFournet link-only answers are discouraged across StackExchange sites. Please explain it in addition to the citation. – prash Dec 22 '20 at 16:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.