0

Starostin alleges that IE root h₁n̥gʷnís has cognates in Finno-Urgic.

But I distrust this database and also I would like to know what was the proto-form of the root, particularly, the origin of Mari ǝŋɣä-.

4
  • 3
    it's worth noting Starostin only alleges reflexes in Ugric, Mari, & Komi Zyrian. These come from a pretty small subarea of the total Uralic range, so I'd be skeptical of an argument for a proto-Uralic (or even proto-FInno-Ugric if that's a valid subgrouping) reconstruction on this basis. That said wiktionary gives the source of Hungarian ég as proto-Uralic *äŋɜ-, corresponding to Starostin's reconstruction and cites uralonet.nytud.hu/eintrag.cgi?locale=en_GB&id_eintrag=45 so it isn't just. Starostin – Tristan Jan 25 at 15:39
  • @Tristan thanks, I wonder, what the characters in äŋɜ- mean though... – Anixx Jan 25 at 15:42
  • 2
    it's common uralicist notation using the Uralic Phonetic Alphabet. <ä> is a low vowel with front harmony, as in Finnish, <ŋ> is a velar nasal as in the IPA, <ɜ> is an uncertain vowel (i.e. the same as V in Starostin's notation) – Tristan Jan 25 at 16:01
  • @Tristan thanks – Anixx Jan 25 at 16:02
2

The reconstruction as PIE root h₁n̥gʷnís is highly dubious.
IMO better is H3egni-, even though some comparanda do not fit very well into it (They don't fit in h₁n̥gʷnís either...).
A connection with Mari, Khanty and Hungarian is thinkable, but Komi with a palatal nasal does not seem to fit.

1

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.