1

"The distinction between *ě₁ and *ě₂ is based on etymology and have different effects on a preceding consonant: *ě₁ triggers the first palatalization and then becomes *a, while *ě₂ triggers the second palatalization and does not change."
from Proto-Slavic_language
I didn't find any example of ě₁ palatalization.
google gives only 50 not unique results at all
I need help.

2
  • 2
    Unfortunately, the Wikipedia article you linked does not have many footnotes giving the source of particular claims. I have asked the Wikipedia editor who actually inserted that text in 2013 if they can elucidate.
    – Colin Fine
    Feb 16 at 17:50
  • 1
    @AlexB. Unfortunately you are wrong. *ě₁ and *ě₂ is a convenient way to distinguish between Proto-Slavic ě (PIE *ē) and Proto-Slavic ě (PIE *ai, *oi)
    – fedor
    Feb 16 at 22:12
3

What is often marked ě in Slavic studies was probably actually a long e (*ē, with some unspecified degree of openness). I am not sure there is any widely accepted intermediate *ě₁ that would be clearly distinct from the original *ē. One could simply consider *C₁ē > *C₂a.

The examples that changed to an "a" could be:

mozg‑ē‑nos > mozd’žanъ > moždanъ > možd’žanъ > možd’anъ > (OCS можданъ - marrow)

(compare with mozg, мозг - brain)

or

pisk‑ē‑la (or piskělь) > pištalь (OCS пищаль - flute)

(compare with pískati, пискати - sqeak)

(from https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/PALATALIZACE - in Czech)

4
  • What is often marked ě in Slavic studies was actually a long e PIE *ē, PS ě₁ (сѣꙗти, вѣꙗти compare sow but seed) and actually a PIE ai/oi ě₂ (хлѣбъ, дѣлити compare loaf, deal (+ i mutation)) Thanks for the examples
    – fedor
    Feb 17 at 22:00
  • @fedor Please understand that what you mark ѣ was no modern Russian е sound. The reconstruction of Proto-Slavic ě/ѣ is much more problematic. And do not argue with modern English, for god's sake, that went hrough way too many sound changes.
    – Vladimir F
    Feb 18 at 8:17
  • 1
    @fedor Please read en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yat for introduction, but it does not contain everything. But it is quite clear that yat was some kind of long e.
    – Vladimir F
    Feb 18 at 8:20
  • Vladimir извини, с реконструкцией ятя всё ясно и у меня сейчас вопрос закрыт, я привёл тебе пример с sow ибо англ. o sow ~ др.англ. a sa(w)an ~ готское ai saian (которое также как и в славянском ять имеет две природы ē и ai) "Similarly, verb stems ending in -ái-, -áu-, -ē-, -iu-, and -ō- become -aj-, -aw, -ai-, -iw, and -au- respectively;" поэтому sow но seed, извини пока больше отвечать не буду, пока по-английски сформулирую день пройдёт времени нету, можем списаться где-нибудь, если хочешь
    – fedor
    Feb 18 at 8:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.