Take for example English voiceless plosives such as /p t k/ which are aspirated at the start of a stressed syllable and before a vowel as in kill, tar, pie:

  • [kʰɪl]
  • [tʰɑː(r)]
  • [pʰaɪ]

But after a preceding /s/:

  • [skɪl]
  • [stɑː(r)]
  • [spaɪ]

the /s/ blocks the aspiration. What does it do to the aspiration? Is there any phonetic explanation?

  • 1
    Most of the air stock gets spent for the pronouncing the sibilant /s/ leaving little for the following plosive, there's even hardly any air left to make the plosion, none remains for the aspiration. – Yellow Sky Apr 1 at 10:47
  • 5
    @YellowSky I don't understand your comment (scratches head). A whole utterance of several words is often performed on a single egressive stream of pulmonic air. If what you say held, there'd be no aspiration, or even plosion in any utterance that started with an initial /s/. The other thing is that aspiration is just a period of voiceless vowel before the vocal fold vibration kicks in. It doesn't require an extra reserve of air. And how would the following vowel be performed if there was no air left? – Araucaria - he him Apr 2 at 22:22
  • @Araucaria-Nothereanymore. - By the air stock I mean the quantity of air needed for the pronunciation of one syllable. Naturally, when we speak and perform utterance of several words on a single egressive stream of pulmonic air, each syllable has a particular properly measured quantity of air intended for its pronunciation, so as while we speak the loudness wouldn't decrease towards the end of the current egressive air stream. I thought it was clear I was speaking about a single syllable, since the /s/ of a previous syllable/word doesn't affect aspiration: [ðis.tʰaʊə] “this tower”. – Yellow Sky Apr 3 at 6:49
  • 4
    @YellowSky I still don't quite understand, because even if the /s/ is at the beginning of a syllable, there's a lungful of air available for aspiration should it be required. – Araucaria - he him Apr 4 at 3:39
  • @Araucaria-Nothereanymore. - Nevermind. Anyhow, I wrote that first comment on April 1. :) – Yellow Sky Apr 6 at 8:31

Since syllable-final voiceless consonants are also not aspirated ([ɹæt], not *[ɹætʰ]), we generally focus on saying when you get aspiration, and don't say that voiceless stops are intrinsically aspirated. So the rule for assigning aspiration to otherwise unaspirated voiceless stops is that they are aspirated syllable-initially. In skill, /k/ is not syllable initial, so there is no aspiration. It's therefor not about /s/ per se, it's about syllable position and the only thing in English that comes before a stop in a syllable onset is /s/ (or /ʃ/).

There is a problem with the syllable-initial analysis, that there is no aspiration in [ˈhæpi], that is between vowels where the first vowel is stressed and the second is unstressed (cf. also [ˈlɛɪˌtʰɛks]). Either you have to treat "happy" as [ˈhæp.i], or you re-state the rule to refer to the stress foot (a two- or three-syllable unit with stress in the first syllable). People have also tried to relate non-aspiration to physical properties of /s/, e.g. saying that /s/ is aspirated and this is a dissimilation process, but given words like mistrial (two stress feet) blaming the problem on /s/ does not get you far enough.

  • 1
    Very interesting! Could you add some links to the research you mentioned? I'd love to read it myself because I've always wanted to learn more about theoretical explanations of aspiration rules in English. – Alex B. Apr 1 at 16:03
  • 3
    In some parts of England, word final unvoiced stops are aspirated, sometimes to the degree that /t/ and /k/ are affricated. – Colin Fine Apr 1 at 21:39
  • Is there any conclusive evidence that the plosive following an initial /s/ is fortis/voiceless in the first place? – Araucaria - he him Apr 2 at 22:25
  • @ColinFine Are they aspirated or just lenited? My understanding of aspiration only applies to the voiceless section of a post consonantal vowel. Is there's a different conception of it? – Araucaria - he him Apr 2 at 22:29
  • I don't know. Wikipedia says "Aspirated consonants are not always followed by vowels or other voiced sounds. For example, in Eastern Armenian, aspiration is contrastive even word-finally, and aspirated consonants occur in consonant clusters. In Wahgi, consonants are aspirated only when they are in final position" (though that is not sourced). Certainly, Georgian თ is classified as an aspirated consonsant, and the instrumental case-ending -ით ends with it. – Colin Fine Apr 3 at 10:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.