0

Why is this 𓏭 Egyptian Hieroglyph associated with the Hebrew letter ז [Zayin] and not the word וו [VaV]?

  • [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo-Hebrew_alphabet] claims the 𓏭 pictogram is the origin for the Paleo-Hebrew 𐤆 zayin.

  • [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Egyptian_hieroglyphs] then claims the 𓏭 was engraved "as a replacement for signs perceived to be dangerous to be actually written".

  • We find the Hebrew word וָו [VaV] "hook" in Exodus 38:28 which shares closer pictographic similarities to the Egyptian 𓏭

Thanks for any insight in regards to this 𓏭 hieroglyph.

6
  • 1
    For what it's worth, I've never seen Z4 (the dual strokes) used to replace a dangerous sign; single slashes, X's, and dots are more common in my experience.
    – Draconis
    Jun 17 at 1:07
  • @Draconis - Thank you. | Do you know the Egyptian name of the 𓏭 engraving? Jun 17 at 1:10
  • More relevantly, though, why are you comparing Aramaic square writing to Egyptian, rather than its ancestors? If you're linking to the wikipedia page for Paleo-Hebrew script, you've presumably looked at the tables there and seen that Paleo-Hebrew waw didn't look like a single vertical line.
    – Draconis
    Jun 17 at 1:11
  • 1
    To answer your other question, as far as I know, the Egyptians didn't have names for most hieroglyphic signs. Modern Egyptologists call it either "Z4" or "the dual strokes", since it looks like a pair of strokes and is used to write dual nouns (nouns indicating exactly two of something).
    – Draconis
    Jun 17 at 1:13
  • 2
    All that said, I have no idea why scholars (according to Wikipedia) say zayin came from that sign either. I'm not by any means an expert on Proto-Sinaitic, but that sign in Egyptian doesn't really have anything to do with a weapon. There are other signs that would be much more obvious choices for representing "weapon". The Wikipedia page for Proto-Sinaitic suggests instead sign N34, a metal ingot, and that makes much more sense to me.
    – Draconis
    Jun 17 at 16:04
5

You're comparing glyphs from very different time periods.

The word wāw (or vāv) looks like two vertical lines in the square script (ktav ashuri). However, scholars have a pretty good idea where this script came from, historically: it was adapted from the imperial Aramaic script, which came from the Phoenician script, which probably came from Proto-Sinaitic script, which was probably adapted from some form of Egyptian writing (cursive hieroglyphic or hieratic).

In other words, the square script wasn't adapted from Egyptian—the Proto-Sinaitic script was. (Probably. It's not entirely understood, mostly due to lack of evidence.) And the Proto-Sinaitic ancestor of waw wasn't a vertical line.

Besides, from the perspective of the people adapting Proto-Sinaitic, there's no real reason why hieroglyph Z4 (the two diagonal strokes) would be used to write the letter w. In hieroglyphic writing, that sign represents y (probably /j/), when used as the dual ending for nouns. And while Hebrew has some remnants of a dual, there's no w in it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.