-4

What is the reason of w dissimilation?

Gothic waurts + gards ~ aurtigards
or
OE wyrt +‎ ġeard ~ ortgeard

1 Answer 1

3

Obviously there is no dissimilation going on in the OE form wyrt or the Gothic form waurts, because there is no internal similarity to dissimilate; the dissimilation would have happened in the Proto-Germanic form *wurtiz, where the similarity of the *w to the following *u gave rise to the former's deletion and the creation of the form *urtiz. That's the form that (likely) would have gone into the common ancestor of orchard and aurtigards.
Since the semivowel [w] is merely the non-syllabic version of [u], it often undergoes (systematic or incidental) deletion when appearing next to it in a lot of languages. The boukólos rule in PIE is the famous example here, and it also happened again in Germanic.

(When Wiktionary claims ortgeard is equivalent to wyrt +‎ ġeard, that doesn't mean it was formed from literally those two words in those forms, but only that the constituent parts are in some sense equivalent. And when it claims aurtigards is cognate with English orchard, you can't then combine that claim with the previous and assume the direct Gothic cognates of wyrt and ġeard, waurts and gards, must be the forms that went into the Gothic word. Please use your sources critically.
I'm guessing you also got the idea that dissimilation is involved at all from Wiktionary, as the orchard entry mentions it; this would have been good to mention on your part. It also explicitly mentions *urtiz.)

5

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.