I was going through Jurafsky book. It says following about pronouns in the context of tag set:

Wh-pronouns (what, who, whom, whoever) are used in certain question forms, or act as complementizers (Frida, who married Diego...).

But there are two categories for Wh-pronouns in Penn tagset:

  • WP: Wh-pronoun
  • WP$: Possissive wh-pronoun

I was guessing which Wh-pronouns are possessive and which are not. I feel only "whose" is possessive and rest all (which, where, who, whom etc) are not possessive. Am I correct with this?

  • 1
    In your example "Frida, who married Diego...", "who" is not a complementizer. It can't be since it does not introduce a complement clause. Its POS is pronoun and its function is subject of the relative clause.
    – BillJ
    Aug 29 '21 at 10:48
  • I must admit it's odd to think of who as a complementizer. That would make nonrestrictive relative clauses (and their shrapnel, appositives) into noun complements.
    – jlawler
    Sep 27 '21 at 19:49

You are right. There only 'whose' is possessive:

The tag for WHOSE is WPRO$.

he_PRO asked_VBD hir_PRO ... whos_WPRO$ was_BED the_D child_N within_P her_PRO$ body_N

and_CONJ by_P whoos_WPRO$ commandement_N

Look up here for more explanations of the Pen tagset: https://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/annotation/index.html

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.