A curious and nice property of German is that some nouns don't have, say, intrinsic names, but composed (German!) names according to the human use or perception. For instance:

Pusteblume (Löwenzahn) = pusten (blow) + Blume (flower).

The question is: is there a known name for this feature?

Remark. Dutch possesses the same characteristic. My favorite example there is the word (de) paddestoel. In this compound name pad means Kröte and stoel, Stuhl: together, paddestoel means Pilz (Fruchtkörper) — d.h. der Stuhl der Kröte.

  • 4
    Might this not be a general feature of the human psyche and of human languages in general? English: "Devil's Bite", "Healing Blade", "Thoudand Leaf". English may use more Latin/Greek/French based words, where the etymology is not obvious, but even the "common name dandelion (dændɨlaɪ.ən, from French dent-de-lion, means 'lion's tooth'). In Japanese, to name a few, there is 向日葵(sunflower), lit. "going with the sun"; or 仏の座(henbit), lit. "Buddha's seat". Also note the English names of these to plants. I don't know about other languages, but I would not be surprised if the situation were similar. – blutorange Aug 18 '13 at 19:05
  • 3
    And I wonder, what exactly is an "intrinsic" name, is this a term that can be given a meaningful defintion? If you look deep enough (back in history), aren't many or most names (of plants, animals, but also other objects) based upon a certain feature of that object? Even the scientific name Taraxacum, while its etymology being lost in the mist of time, is explained as being derived from (a) taraxos(disorder)+achos(medicine) or (b) from the Persian "bitter-tasting weed sold at the bazaar. There are some other hypotheses, but what they've all got in common is that it's not an intrinsic name. – blutorange Aug 18 '13 at 19:22
  • @blutorange Interesting. Yes, I know that intrinsic is ill-defined. But "intrinsic" is less ill-defined :). What I want to be discussed/answered are the etymologies, which have immediately an explicit (German!) composed name, based on human needs or perception. The question might have a simple answer like "No." But I think I need to know what's the name of this term -- if any. So I modified a little the question, according to your suggestion. – c.p. Aug 18 '13 at 19:26
  • 1
    Talking of answers... the very nice and well elaborated comments of @blutorange should definitely be an answer. Here's my favorite English compound in this context: Jellyfish. – Takkat Aug 18 '13 at 21:05
  • I agree that you might get better answers on linguistics. Perhaps there is some scientific term for this, but I don't think (=I have never heard of this as a native speaker) there's a common, popular, non-scientific name people often use, nor that this is a well-known or named phenomenon of our culture. What comes close to this is the tendency that many scientific names are compounds of easily recognized German(ic) words. Just compare wikipedia articles: Keuchhusten(Pertussis), Lungenentzündung(Pneumonia), Grashüpfer(Gomphocerinae), Frühgeschichte(Protohistory). It's what I like about German. – blutorange Aug 19 '13 at 4:17

I think there is no specific linguistic name for this feature. It rather has a share in composition and metaphorics. By the time compounds lose their transparency, e.g. germ. Eimer ("bucket") < *ein-ber < PIE. *oino- "one" + root *bher- "carry". What you have spotted is the contrast of intransparent versus transparent morphology.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.